Jackpocket, Inc. v. Lottomatrix NY LLC
- Lewis Liman
- 1:22-cv-05772
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Jackpocket v. Lottomatrix, Judge Liman denied Jackpocket’s request for a permanent injunction and other equitable relief.
Jackpocket, Inc., whose request for a permanent injunction and other equitable relief was denied, and all parties, who were directed to follow the court’s procedures for requesting sealing.
What happened
In Jackpocket, Inc. v. Lottomatrix NY LLC, the court said a separate opinion and order filed under seal explained its decision to deny Jackpocket’s request for a permanent injunction and other equitable relief.
The court directed the parties to discuss what material should remain sealed. Any party seeking sealing had to file a letter motion by December 14, 2022, identifying the specific material and reasons for sealing. The court emphasized the presumption that judicial documents are publicly accessible.
Judge Lewis J. Liman stated that failing to file a sealing motion by the deadline would waive the right to request sealing, absent another court order. The provided order does not explain why the request for a permanent injunction was denied.
The detailed version
- Jackpocket, Inc. v. Lottomatrix NY LLC · No. 1:22-cv-05772
- Lewis Liman
- Dec. 7, 2022
What the Court Decided
The court denied plaintiff Jackpocket, Inc.’s request for a permanent injunction and other equitable relief. A permanent injunction is a court order requiring or prohibiting conduct on an ongoing basis. The order states that the reasons were set out in a separate opinion and order filed under seal; that separate opinion is not included in the provided text.
Sealing Procedures
The parties were directed to meet and confer about which material should be filed under seal. Any party seeking sealing had to submit, by December 14, 2022, a publicly filed letter motion identifying by page number the specific basis for sealing. The party also had to provide a copy of the opinion and order marked to show the words and sentences it wanted sealed; that marked copy could be filed under seal.
The court reminded the parties that sealing requests must account for the presumption of public access to judicial documents. It stated that a failure to file a sealing motion by the deadline would waive the right to seek sealing, unless the court later ordered otherwise. The court planned to consider any requests together with applicable case law before filing a publicly accessible version of the opinion and order.
Disposition
The court denied Jackpocket’s request for a permanent injunction and other equitable relief. The provided order does not state the basis for that denial or otherwise describe the parties’ underlying dispute.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.