Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Substantive rulingFiled Dec. 7, 2022

Jackpocket, Inc. v. Lottomatrix NY LLC

Judge
Lewis Liman
Docket
1:22-cv-05772
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedurePreliminary Injunction
In one sentence

In Jackpocket v. Lottomatrix, Judge Liman denied Jackpocket’s request for a permanent injunction and other equitable relief.

Who this affects

Jackpocket, Inc., whose request for a permanent injunction and other equitable relief was denied, and all parties, who were directed to follow the court’s procedures for requesting sealing.

What happened

In Jackpocket, Inc. v. Lottomatrix NY LLC, the court said a separate opinion and order filed under seal explained its decision to deny Jackpocket’s request for a permanent injunction and other equitable relief.

The court directed the parties to discuss what material should remain sealed. Any party seeking sealing had to file a letter motion by December 14, 2022, identifying the specific material and reasons for sealing. The court emphasized the presumption that judicial documents are publicly accessible.

Judge Lewis J. Liman stated that failing to file a sealing motion by the deadline would waive the right to request sealing, absent another court order. The provided order does not explain why the request for a permanent injunction was denied.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Jackpocket, Inc. v. Lottomatrix NY LLC · No. 1:22-cv-05772
Judge
Lewis Liman
Date
Dec. 7, 2022

What the Court Decided

The court denied plaintiff Jackpocket, Inc.’s request for a permanent injunction and other equitable relief. A permanent injunction is a court order requiring or prohibiting conduct on an ongoing basis. The order states that the reasons were set out in a separate opinion and order filed under seal; that separate opinion is not included in the provided text.

Sealing Procedures

The parties were directed to meet and confer about which material should be filed under seal. Any party seeking sealing had to submit, by December 14, 2022, a publicly filed letter motion identifying by page number the specific basis for sealing. The party also had to provide a copy of the opinion and order marked to show the words and sentences it wanted sealed; that marked copy could be filed under seal.

The court reminded the parties that sealing requests must account for the presumption of public access to judicial documents. It stated that a failure to file a sealing motion by the deadline would waive the right to seek sealing, unless the court later ordered otherwise. The court planned to consider any requests together with applicable case law before filing a publicly accessible version of the opinion and order.

Disposition

The court denied Jackpocket’s request for a permanent injunction and other equitable relief. The provided order does not state the basis for that denial or otherwise describe the parties’ underlying dispute.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.