Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Dec. 13, 2022

Red Rock Sourcing LLC v. JGX, LLC

Judge
John Cronan
Docket
1:21-cv-01054
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureDiscovery
In one sentence

In Red Rock Sourcing v. JGX, Judge Cronan ordered a response about proposed redactions without deciding whether the complaint should be sealed.

Who this affects

Red Rock Sourcing LLC, Coronado Distributing LLC, Syd Ghermezian, and Triple Five Worldwide, LLC, concerning proposed redactions to the revised Second Amended Complaint.

What happened

Red Rock Sourcing LLC v. JGX, LLC concerns the plaintiffs’ proposed revised Second Amended Complaint, which included allegations based on documents marked confidential by Syd Ghermezian and Triple Five Worldwide, LLC.

The plaintiffs asked to file portions of the proposed complaint under seal to prevent disclosure of that information. They also said they had challenged some confidentiality designations and reserved their rights.

Judge John P. Cronan did not grant or deny the sealing request. Instead, he ordered counsel for Triple Five Worldwide, LLC to submit a letter by December 28, 2022, explaining whether information should be redacted and why public access should be outweighed.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Red Rock Sourcing LLC v. JGX, LLC · No. 1:21-cv-01054
Judge
John Cronan
Date
Dec. 13, 2022

Background

The plaintiffs, Red Rock Sourcing LLC and Coronado Distributing LLC, were preparing a proposed revised Second Amended Complaint under the Court’s November 29, 2022 order. Some new allegations were based on documents produced by Syd Ghermezian and Defendant Triple Five Worldwide, LLC. Those documents had been marked “Confidential” under a protective order in the case.

The plaintiffs said the documents concerned, among other things, Don Ghermezian’s management of the hand-sanitizer business, the corporate structure of Triple Five entities, CFSB’s involvement in Triple Five Worldwide’s operations, and Triple Five Worldwide’s conduct toward the plaintiffs and public safety. The plaintiffs had objected to some confidentiality designations but requested sealing to avoid disclosing information they said came from or was based solely on the confidential documents.

The Request

The plaintiffs asked to file clean and redline versions of the proposed Second Amended Complaint with the relevant allegations removed from the publicly filed versions. They said unredacted copies would be sent to the Court and counsel. The request concerned the public-access presumption for judicial records and whether countervailing factors justified limiting access.

Court’s Action

Judge John P. Cronan ordered counsel for Defendant Triple Five Worldwide, LLC to submit a letter by December 28, 2022, stating whether any information in the revised Second Amended Complaint should be redacted and explaining why the presumption of public access should be outweighed. The order did not grant or deny the plaintiffs’ request to file the proposed complaint under seal.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.