Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Dec. 15, 2022

Anekwe v. Bernstein

Judge
Loretta Preska
Docket
1:21-cv-11108
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Anekwe v. Bernstein, Judge Preska ordered New York’s Attorney General to find Bernstein’s service address so the pro se plaintiff could be served.

Who this affects

Peter Anekwe, Frederick Bernstein, the New York State Attorney General, the Clerk of Court, and the U.S. Marshals Service.

What happened

Peter Anekwe, who is incarcerated and represents himself, sued Frederick Bernstein and Albert Acrish. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims.

Anekwe could not provide a current address for Bernstein, and attempts to serve Bernstein at Green Haven Correctional Facility were unsuccessful. The court ordered the New York State Attorney General to find an address where Bernstein could be served and provide it to Anekwe and the court within 30 days.

The order did not decide the merits of Anekwe’s claims. Judge Loretta A. Preska stated that, after receiving the address, the court would direct the Clerk of Court to prepare service forms and send the necessary documents to the U.S. Marshals Service.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Anekwe v. Bernstein · No. 1:21-cv-11108
Judge
Loretta Preska
Date
Dec. 15, 2022

Background

Peter Anekwe, who is incarcerated at Fishkill Correctional Facility, brought this action without a lawyer against Frederick Bernstein, identified as the former Medical Director of Green Haven Correctional Facility’s medical department, and Albert Acrish, identified as a medical provider. The court had previously granted Anekwe permission to proceed without paying the filing fee.

Service Issue

Anekwe was unable to provide a current address for Bernstein. Attempts to serve Bernstein were unsuccessful because he was not located at Green Haven Correctional Facility. The court cited the rule that a self-represented litigant is entitled to the district court’s assistance in identifying a defendant.

Order

The court ordered the New York State Attorney General to determine the addresses where Bernstein could be served and provide that information to Anekwe and the court within 30 days. After receiving the information, the court stated that it would direct the Clerk of Court to complete the required service forms with Bernstein’s address and deliver the documents needed for service to the U.S. Marshals Service. The order addressed service assistance only and did not decide the underlying claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.