Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Dec. 16, 2022

REILS Finance SPV v. CIP 1300 U Street Owner, LLC

Judge
Jesse Furman
Docket
1:22-cv-07280
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
14
Civil ProcedureBankruptcyPro Se
In one sentence

REILS Finance SPV v. CIP 1300 U Street Owner: Judge Furman extended defendants’ opposition deadline and scheduled a default-judgment hearing.

Who this affects

REILS Finance SPV, CIP 1300 U Street Owner, LLC, and Robert W. Clippinger were affected. The order extended the defendants’ opposition deadline, set a reply deadline for REILS Finance SPV, scheduled a default-judgment hearing, and recorded that Clippinger was proceeding without a lawyer unless counsel appeared.

What happened

In REILS Finance SPV v. CIP 1300 U Street Owner, Robert Clippinger emailed the court about attending without a lawyer and asserted that an underlying entity was in bankruptcy, possibly triggering a legal stay. He also said he was discussing representation with a lawyer.

The court gave the defendants one final extension, until January 19, 2023, to oppose REILS Finance SPV’s request for default judgment, including any argument about a bankruptcy stay. REILS Finance SPV could reply by January 26, and the court scheduled a default-judgment hearing for February 2, 2023.

Judge Jesse M. Furman did not decide whether a bankruptcy stay applied or whether default judgment should be entered. He also reminded the company defendant that it could appear in federal court only through a licensed lawyer and directed the clerk to record that Clippinger was proceeding without a lawyer unless an attorney appeared for him.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
REILS Finance SPV v. CIP 1300 U Street Owner, LLC · No. 1:22-cv-07280
Judge
Jesse Furman
Date
Dec. 16, 2022

Background

REILS Finance SPV had filed a motion for default judgment against CIP 1300 U Street Owner, LLC, and Robert W. Clippinger. The order states that Clippinger emailed the court with attachments and later participated in a telephone conference. In the email, Clippinger said he would attend without a lawyer, was meeting with an attorney, and believed that a bankruptcy filing involving an underlying entity might create an automatic bankruptcy stay. He also stated that the parties were working toward a refinancing plan. The order did not decide whether any stay applied.

Deadlines and hearing

The court granted defendants one final extension to file opposition to the motion for default judgment, including any argument that the case was subject to an automatic bankruptcy stay. The new deadline was January 19, 2023. If no opposition was filed by then, the court stated that it might enter default judgment as unopposed. REILS Finance SPV’s reply deadline was January 26, 2023, and the court scheduled a default-judgment hearing for February 2, 2023, at 3:45 p.m.

Representation and disposition

The court reminded defendants that a company may appear in federal court only through licensed counsel and that repeated failure to appear through counsel may lead to default judgment against the company. The clerk was directed to record that Clippinger was proceeding without a lawyer unless and until an attorney entered an appearance for him and to mail him a copy of the order. Judge Jesse M. Furman’s order set deadlines and a hearing; it did not grant or deny the motion for default judgment and did not resolve the bankruptcy-stay issue.

The authoritative version

Read the full 14-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.