Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Dec. 19, 2022

Baldeo v. United States

Judge
Paul Crotty
Docket
1:17-cv-01692
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureCriminal
In one sentence

In Baldeo v. United States, Judge Crotty declined to issue a certificate of appealability because Baldeo did not make the required constitutional-rights showing.

Who this affects

Albert Jairam Baldeo, whose appeal did not receive a certificate of appealability from the district court.

What happened

In Baldeo v. United States, the court had previously denied Albert Jairam Baldeo’s petition for a special post-conviction writ and related claims. Baldeo appealed that decision.

Baldeo did not ask the district court for a certificate of appealability, which is a document needed for certain appeals. The court nevertheless considered whether to issue one.

Judge Paul A. Crotty declined to issue the certificate because Baldeo had not made a substantial showing that a constitutional right was denied. The court also stated that reasonable judges could not debate whether Baldeo was entitled to the requested relief.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Baldeo v. United States · No. 1:17-cv-01692
Judge
Paul Crotty
Date
Dec. 19, 2022

Background

On January 25, 2022, the court issued an opinion and order denying Albert Jairam Baldeo’s petition for a writ of error coram nobis and related claims. A writ of error coram nobis is a post-conviction remedy. Baldeo appealed that order but did not request a certificate of appealability from the district court.

Certificate of Appealability

The court declined to issue a certificate of appealability. A certificate of appealability permits an appeal in certain post-conviction proceedings. To obtain one, a petitioner must make a substantial showing that a constitutional right was denied.

The court found that Baldeo had not made that showing. It also stated that reasonable judges could not debate whether Baldeo was entitled to coram nobis relief.

Disposition

Judge Paul A. Crotty declined to issue a certificate of appealability. This order addressed the certificate request and did not reconsider the court’s earlier denial of Baldeo’s petition.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.