Stewart v. Caputo
- Laura Swain
- 1:22-cv-08546
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Stewart v. Caputo, Judge Swain denied a duplicate habeas petition, dismissed it without prejudice, and ordered the filing fee returned.
Al-Fatah Stewart, whose duplicate habeas petition was denied and dismissed without prejudice; the court directed that his $5.00 filing fee be returned.
What happened
In Stewart v. Caputo, Al-Fatah Stewart filed a petition challenging the constitutionality of ongoing criminal proceedings in New York County. He was detained at the Anna M. Kross Center on Rikers Island and filed the petition without a lawyer.
The court found that Stewart had already filed a substantially similar petition involving the same challenges in a pending case, No. 22-CV-7853 (GHW). Because this case was duplicative, the court said no useful purpose would be served by continuing it.
Judge Laura Taylor Swain denied the petition as duplicative and dismissed it without prejudice to the pending case. She also ordered the Clerk of Court to return Stewart’s $5.00 filing fee, ruled that a certificate of appealability would not issue, and denied permission to appeal without paying fees.
The detailed version
- Stewart v. Caputo · No. 1:22-cv-08546
- Laura Swain
- Dec. 16, 2022
Background
Al-Fatah Stewart, who was detained at the Anna M. Kross Center on Rikers Island, filed a petition without a lawyer under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. He challenged the constitutionality of his ongoing criminal proceedings in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County.
Reason for the ruling
The court stated that Stewart had previously filed a substantially similar § 2241 petition raising the same challenges. That earlier case remained pending before another judge of the court under docket number 22-CV-7853 (GHW). The court concluded that this petition duplicated the pending case and that no useful purpose would be served by filing and litigating the duplicate action. The court did not decide the constitutional challenges to the ongoing criminal proceedings.
Ruling
The court’s conclusion states that it denied Stewart’s § 2241 petition as duplicative of No. 22-CV-7853 (GHW). The body of the order also states that the petition was dismissed without prejudice to Stewart’s pending case. The court said that any new claims should be raised through an amended petition in the pending case, to the extent permitted by Rule 15 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
The court directed the Clerk of Court to return the $5.00 filing fee. It also ruled that a certificate of appealability would not issue, certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith, denied permission to appeal without paying fees, and directed the Clerk to enter judgment.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.