Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Dec. 20, 2022

Shamis v. Solil Management, LLC

Judge
Vernon Broderick
Docket
1:20-cv-07064
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Shamis v. Solil Management, LLC, Judge Broderick ordered a joint letter stating whether the parties would object to a settlement-approval recommendation.

Who this affects

The parties to the case, who were required to jointly report whether they intended to object to the settlement-approval recommendation and, if so, propose an objection schedule.

What happened

In Shamis v. Solil Management, LLC, Magistrate Judge Ona Wang had issued a recommendation about the parties’ request for settlement approval. The recommendation was issued on December 1, 2022.

As of December 20, 2022, no party had objected to the recommendation, and no one had requested more time. The order warned that failing to object on time would waive the right to raise those objections on appeal.

Judge Vernon S. Broderick ordered the parties to file a joint letter by December 22, 2022, stating whether they wanted to object and, if so, proposing a schedule for objections. The order did not itself approve or reject the settlement.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Shamis v. Solil Management, LLC · No. 1:20-cv-07064
Judge
Vernon Broderick
Date
Dec. 20, 2022

Background

The parties had submitted a motion seeking approval of a settlement. On December 1, 2022, Magistrate Judge Ona Wang issued a Report and Recommendation concerning that motion.

Status of Objections

The district court stated that, as of December 20, 2022, no objections to the Report and Recommendation had been filed and no requests for extensions had been made. The court explained that failing to file timely objections would waive those objections for purposes of appeal.

Order

Judge Vernon S. Broderick ordered the parties to file a joint letter by December 22, 2022. The letter had to state whether the parties wished to file objections and, if they did, propose a schedule for those objections. This order did not rule on whether the settlement should be approved.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.