Carrico v. Navico, Inc.
- Vyskocil
- 1:22-cv-08187
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Carrico v. Navico, Judge Vyskocil discontinued the action after a settlement in principle, subject to restoration by January 23, 2023.
Joyce Carrico, the others she sought to represent, and Navico, Inc.; the action was discontinued subject to the stated deadline and settlement conditions.
What happened
In Carrico v. Navico, Inc., the defendant told the court that the parties had reached a settlement in principle. The opinion does not describe the settlement’s terms.
The court discontinued the action without costs to either party and allowed it to be restored if the parties could not put their settlement in writing, provided they applied by January 23, 2023. If no application was made by that date, the court stated that the dismissal would be with prejudice.
Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil entered the order on December 20, 2022.
The detailed version
- Carrico v. Navico, Inc. · No. 1:22-cv-08187
- Vyskocil
- Dec. 20, 2022
Background
Joyce Carrico brought the action on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated against Navico, Inc. Navico informed the court by letter that the parties had reached a settlement in principle. The opinion does not provide the settlement’s terms.
Court’s action
The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party. It allowed the action to be restored to the court’s calendar if the parties were unable to put their settlement in writing, but only if an application to restore the action was made by January 23, 2023.
The court further stated that if no application to restore the action was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice, meaning the action could not be brought again. The order did not decide the underlying claims or approve or describe the settlement.
Judge
Mary Kay Vyskocil, United States District Judge, issued the order.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.