Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Dec. 21, 2022

EscapeX IP LLC v. Block, Inc.

Judge
Jesse Furman
Docket
1:22-cv-03575
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureIntellectual Property
In one sentence

In EscapeX IP LLC v. Block, Inc., Judge Furman ordered supplemental briefs on the possible impact of an earlier decision.

Who this affects

EscapeX IP LLC and Block, Inc., which were required to submit supplemental briefs.

What happened

EscapeX IP LLC v. Block, Inc. is a case in which the court asked the parties to address an earlier decision involving intellectual-property claims.

The court directed each party to submit a supplemental brief of no more than five pages by January 6, 2023. The briefs had to discuss whether, and how, the court’s decision in Guvera IP Pty Ltd. v. Spotify, Inc. affected this case.

Judge Furman entered this briefing order on December 21, 2022. The opinion did not decide the parties’ underlying dispute or state whether either side prevailed.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
EscapeX IP LLC v. Block, Inc. · No. 1:22-cv-03575
Judge
Jesse Furman
Date
Dec. 21, 2022

Order

The court directed EscapeX IP LLC and Block, Inc. to submit supplemental briefs, limited to five pages each, by January 6, 2023.

Subject of the Briefs

The parties were ordered to address the impact, if any, of the court’s earlier decision in Guvera IP Pty Ltd. v. Spotify, Inc. The opinion did not explain what the earlier decision held or how it might affect this case.

Disposition

This was a briefing order. The court did not rule on the merits of the dispute, dismiss any claim, or enter judgment.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.