Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Dec. 22, 2022

Lopez v. Capra

Judge
Carter
Docket
1:18-cv-04392
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
HabeasPro Se
In one sentence

In Lopez v. Capra, Judge Carter did not grant a certificate of appealability because Lopez had not substantially shown a constitutional-right violation.

Who this affects

Baldemiro Lopez was not granted a certificate of appealability after the court found that he had not made a substantial showing of a constitutional-right violation.

What happened

In Lopez v. Capra, Baldemiro Lopez had previously petitioned for a court order challenging his custody, and the court had denied that petition.

The court said Lopez had not made a substantial showing that his constitutional rights had been violated. A certificate of appealability, which is required to appeal certain habeas decisions, therefore was not granted.

Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr. ordered that the Clerk of Court mail a copy of the order to Lopez, whom the order identifies as representing himself.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Lopez v. Capra · No. 1:18-cv-04392
Judge
Carter
Date
Dec. 22, 2022

Background

Baldemiro Lopez previously filed a petition for a court order challenging his custody. The opinion states that the court denied that petition in an earlier Opinion and Order.

Court’s Reasoning

The court stated that Lopez had not made a substantial showing that he was denied a constitutional right. On that basis, the court concluded that a certificate of appealability should not be granted. A certificate of appealability is permission to appeal a habeas-corpus decision.

Disposition

The court did not grant a certificate of appealability. Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr. also directed the Clerk of Court to mail a copy of the order to Lopez, whom the order identifies as proceeding without a lawyer.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.