Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Dec. 22, 2022

Scott v. Carter

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:22-cv-10705
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
4
HabeasPro SeCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Scott v. Carter, Judge Swain ordered Willie Scott to pay the $5 filing fee or submit an application to proceed without prepaying fees within 30 days.

Who this affects

Willie Scott must either pay the $5 filing fee or submit the required application within 30 days; otherwise, the action will be dismissed. Warden Carter was not required to answer at this stage.

What happened

In Scott v. Carter, Willie Scott filed a petition in federal court without paying the required $5 filing fee or submitting an application to proceed without prepaying fees.

The court gave Scott 30 days from the order’s date to pay the fee or submit the completed application. No response from Warden Carter was required at that time. The court said the case would be dismissed if Scott did not comply.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain also ruled that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Scott v. Carter · No. 1:22-cv-10705
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Dec. 22, 2022

Background

Willie Scott, representing himself, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus without paying the $5 filing fee and without submitting an application to proceed without prepaying fees. The opinion does not decide the substance of Scott’s petition.

Court’s Order

The court ordered Scott, within 30 days of the order’s date, to do one of two things:

1. Pay the $5 filing fee; or 2. Complete and submit the attached application to proceed without prepaying fees.

The application had to identify docket number 22-CV-10705 (LTS). If the court granted the application, Scott would be allowed to proceed without paying fees in advance. The court stated that no answer from Warden Carter was required at that time and that the case would be processed under the Clerk’s Office procedures if Scott complied. If he did not comply within the allowed time, the action would be dismissed.

Appeal and Disposition

Judge Laura Taylor Swain certified that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith. The court therefore denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees. This order is a procedural filing-fee and application requirement; it does not rule on the merits of Scott’s petition.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.