Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Dec. 22, 2022

Zinnamon v. Kontoor Brands, Inc.

Judge
Vyskocil
Docket
1:22-cv-05437
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureClass Action
In one sentence

In Zinnamon v. Kontoor Brands, Judge Vyskocil discontinued the action after the parties reached a settlement in principle, subject to possible restoration by January 23, 2023.

Who this affects

Warren Zinnamon and Kontoor Brands, Inc.; the action was brought on behalf of Zinnamon and other similarly situated people, but the opinion does not identify them or describe the underlying claims.

What happened

In Zinnamon v. Kontoor Brands, Inc., the defendant told the court that the parties had reached a settlement in principle.

The court discontinued the action without costs to either party and allowed it to be restored if the parties could not put their settlement in writing and applied to restore the case by January 23, 2023.

Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil stated that if no restoration application was filed by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Zinnamon v. Kontoor Brands, Inc. · No. 1:22-cv-05437
Judge
Vyskocil
Date
Dec. 22, 2022

Background

The defendant informed the court by letter that the parties had reached a settlement in principle. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or the proposed settlement terms.

Ruling

The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to the court’s calendar if the parties could not memorialize their settlement in writing. Any application to restore the action had to be made by January 23, 2023. The court further ordered that if no such application was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice.

Effect

The case was conditionally dismissed based on the reported settlement. The opinion does not state whether the settlement was later put in writing or whether any application to restore the action was filed. Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil signed the order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.