Shamis v. Solil Management, LLC
- Vernon Broderick
- 1:20-cv-07064
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Shamis v. Solil Management, LLC, Judge Broderick approved the parties’ wage settlement after finding no clear error.
Ilona Shamis, her counsel, Solil Management, LLC, Jane Goldman, and the other defendants were affected by the approval of the settlement and its payment amounts.
What happened
In Shamis v. Solil Management, LLC, Ilona Shamis sought damages for allegedly unpaid wages under federal and New York wage laws, including the Wage Theft Prevention Act. The parties reported that they had reached a settlement and submitted it for court approval.
Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang recommended awarding Shamis $1,346.16 and her lawyer $673.08 in attorneys’ fees, for a total of $2,019.24. The parties did not object to the recommendation.
Judge Vernon S. Broderick found no clear error, adopted Judge Wang’s recommendation in full, and approved the settlement, including its payment amounts. He also directed the Clerk of Court to close all outstanding motions.
The detailed version
- Shamis v. Solil Management, LLC · No. 1:20-cv-07064
- Vernon Broderick
- Dec. 23, 2022
Background
Ilona Shamis brought claims against Solil Management, LLC, Jane Goldman, and other identified and unidentified defendants. She sought damages for unpaid wages under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and New York Labor Law (NYLL), as well as alleged violations of New York’s Wage Theft Prevention Act.
On July 12, 2021, the parties reported that they had reached a settlement. The settlement was submitted for approval under the requirement recognized in Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc. that certain wage settlements receive judicial review. The court referred the matter to Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang for a report and recommendation.
Report and Recommendation
Judge Wang’s December 1, 2022 Report and Recommendation advised awarding Shamis $1,346.16 and her counsel $673.08 in attorneys’ fees, for a total settlement amount of $2,019.24. The parties did not object to the recommendation.
When no timely objection is made to a magistrate judge’s recommendation, the district court reviews the record for clear error. Clear-error review asks whether the record plainly shows a mistake. Judge Broderick conducted that review and found no clear error.
Ruling
Judge Broderick agreed that the proposed settlement was fair and reasonable and adopted Judge Wang’s Report and Recommendation in its entirety. The court approved the parties’ settlement, including the settlement amount, and directed the Clerk of Court to close all outstanding motions on the docket. The order approved the settlement; it did not decide the underlying wage claims after a trial or other merits determination.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.