Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Dec. 28, 2022

Johnson v. The City of New York

Judge
Katherine Failla
Docket
1:22-cv-06127
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Johnson v. The City of New York, Judge Failla ordered steps to help serve the amended complaint; the case’s merits were not decided.

Who this affects

Kamar Johnson, the defendants named in the amended complaint, the Clerk of Court, and the U.S. Marshals Service.

What happened

In Johnson v. The City of New York, Kamar Johnson filed an amended complaint, and the court addressed how the defendants should receive it. The opinion does not decide the claims.

The court directed the Clerk of Court to complete service forms with the address for Dr. Renrick Benn and send the necessary documents to the U.S. Marshals Service. It also said Johnson should request more time if the complaint is not served within 90 days after the summons is issued.

Judge Katherine Polk Failla issued the order on December 28, 2022. The order concerns service of the complaint and does not resolve the underlying dispute.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Johnson v. The City of New York · No. 1:22-cv-06127
Judge
Katherine Failla
Date
Dec. 28, 2022

Background

The court received Kamar Johnson’s amended complaint, filed December 12, 2022. The caption identifies The City of New York and Dentist John Doe as defendants. The opinion also refers to Dr. Renrick Benn in connection with service.

Court’s Action

The court directed the Clerk of Court to complete the USM-285 forms with Dr. Renrick Benn’s address and deliver all documents needed to effect service to the U.S. Marshals Service. The court stated that, if the complaint is not served within 90 days after the summons is issued, Johnson should request an extension of time for service. The Clerk was also directed to mail a copy of the order to Johnson at his address of record.

Disposition and Significance

This is an order concerning service of process, meaning the formal delivery of the lawsuit documents to the defendants. It does not decide the merits of Johnson’s claims or state whether any defendant is liable. Judge Katherine Polk Failla signed the order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.