Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Dec. 28, 2022

Gannon v. 209-219 W. 38 LLC

Judge
Andrew Carter
Docket
1:22-cv-00879
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureContract
In one sentence

In Gannon v. 209-219 W. 38 LLC, Judge Parker ordered a case-status update after the parties did not file their promised dismissal agreement.

Who this affects

The parties to Gannon v. 209-219 W. 38 LLC, who were ordered to file a joint status letter by January 6, 2023.

What happened

Gannon v. 209-219 W. 38 LLC involved a scheduled initial case-management conference. The parties asked the court to postpone it because they represented that they had reached a settlement in principle and would file an agreement dismissing the case within 30 days.

No dismissal agreement was filed. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or decide their merits.

The court ordered the parties to file a joint letter updating it on the case’s status by January 6, 2023. Katharine H. Parker, the United States Magistrate Judge who signed the order, issued the directive.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Gannon v. 209-219 W. 38 LLC · No. 1:22-cv-00879
Judge
Andrew Carter
Date
Dec. 28, 2022

Background

On August 17, 2022, the court postponed the initial case-management conference at the parties’ request. The parties had represented that they reached a settlement in principle and would file a stipulation of dismissal with the court within 30 days.

Court’s Order

Because no stipulation of dismissal had been filed, the court ordered the parties to file a joint status letter updating the court on the status of the case by January 6, 2023. The order did not decide the underlying dispute or state whether the case would ultimately be dismissed.

Disposition

The court ordered a joint case-status update. The order was signed by Katharine H. Parker, United States Magistrate Judge.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.