Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 3, 2023

Farsura v. QC Terme US Corp

Judge
Loretta Preska
Docket
1:21-cv-09030
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Farsura v. QC Terme US Corp., Judge Lehrburger granted QC Terme US’s request to seal five exhibits containing sensitive business information.

Who this affects

QC Terme US, the plaintiffs, and members of the public seeking access to Exhibits F, N, P, and S, which contained the described business, financial, contract, and payment information.

What happened

In Farsura v. QC Terme US Corp., the plaintiffs filed a motion to amend their complaint and submitted a declaration with exhibits. QC Terme US asked the court to keep Exhibits F, N, P, S, and T under seal, and the plaintiffs did not oppose the request.

QC Terme US said the exhibits contained nonpublic financial information, business strategies, corporate decisions, contract terms, and payment information. It argued that this information could cause competitive harm if disclosed and noted that similar documents had previously been sealed in the case.

Judge Robert W. Lehrburger granted the request and ordered Exhibits F, N, P, S, and T to remain under seal.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Farsura v. QC Terme US Corp · No. 1:21-cv-09030
Judge
Loretta Preska
Date
Jan. 3, 2023

Background

The plaintiffs had filed a motion for permission to amend their complaint and submitted a supporting declaration with exhibits. QC Terme US requested an order sealing Exhibits F, N, P, S, and T to that declaration. QC Terme US stated that it had conferred with the plaintiffs and that the plaintiffs did not oppose sealing the materials.

Request to Seal

QC Terme US argued that the exhibits contained commercially sensitive information. Exhibits F and P included financial information about the QC Terme business, including balance sheets, profit-and-loss statements, future business strategies, and key corporate decisions. Exhibits N, S, and T contained or described contract and payment information, including a loan agreement, a credit agreement, and a bank statement describing a payment to a third party. The letter also stated that the documents had been designated confidential under the protective order and that the plaintiffs had not challenged those designations.

The court’s filing discussed the public’s common-law and First Amendment rights to access certain court documents. It stated that confidential business information, trade secrets, financial information, and contractual terms may justify sealing when the applicable access interests are overcome. QC Terme US also pointed to earlier sealing orders in this case involving similar documents, including some of the same documents.

Ruling

Judge Robert W. Lehrburger granted QC Terme US’s request. The order therefore sealed Exhibits F, N, P, S, and T to the plaintiffs’ supporting declaration.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.