Hegde v. Montefiore Medical Center
- Analisa Torres
- 1:21-cv-09596
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Hegde v. Montefiore Medical Center, Judge Torres granted defendants’ partial motion to dismiss and dismissed Counts Six, Seven, Nine, and Ten with prejudice.
Hegde’s Counts Six, Seven, Nine, and Ten were dismissed with prejudice; the defendants obtained a grant of their partial motion to dismiss.
What happened
In Hegde v. Montefiore Medical Center, Plaintiff Satyanarayan Hegde sued Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Health System Inc., and Raanan Arens, M.D. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims in the dismissed counts.
A magistrate judge issued a report and recommendation, and no party objected. The court reviewed the recommendation for clear error and found none, then adopted it in full.
Judge Torres granted defendants’ partial motion to dismiss. Counts Six, Seven, Nine, and Ten were dismissed with prejudice, and the clerk was directed to close the motion and mail the order to Hegde, who was proceeding without a lawyer.
The detailed version
- Hegde v. Montefiore Medical Center · No. 1:21-cv-09596
- Analisa Torres
- Jan. 4, 2023
Background
Satyanarayan Hegde, M.D., brought the action against Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Health System Inc., and Raanan Arens, M.D. The opinion concerns defendants’ partial motion to dismiss, but it does not explain the factual allegations or the legal theories underlying Counts Six, Seven, Nine, and Ten.
Report and Recommendation
Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn issued a report and recommendation. No objections were filed. The district court reviewed the recommendation for clear error, meaning an obvious mistake, and found none.
Ruling
The court adopted the report and recommendation in its entirety. It granted defendants’ partial motion to dismiss. Counts Six, Seven, Nine, and Ten were dismissed with prejudice. The clerk was directed to terminate the motion and mail a copy of the order to Hegde, who was proceeding without a lawyer.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.