Suez Treatment Solutions, Inc. v. ACE American Insurance Company
- Vyskocil
- 1:20-cv-06082
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Suez Treatment Solutions v. ACE American, Judge Vyskocil discontinued the settled case, allowing restoration by February 6, 2023, before dismissal with prejudice.
Suez Treatment Solutions, Inc., ACE American Insurance Company, and Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company. The action could be restored to the court’s calendar if an application was made by February 6, 2023; otherwise, the dismissal would be with prejudice.
What happened
Suez Treatment Solutions, Inc. v. ACE American Insurance Company involved claims against ACE American Insurance Company and Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company. The court was informed that the parties had settled all issues.
The court discontinued the case without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring it to the court’s calendar by February 6, 2023. If no restoration request was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice.
Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil entered the order on January 5, 2023. The opinion does not describe the settled claims or the settlement’s terms.
The detailed version
- Suez Treatment Solutions, Inc. v. ACE American Insurance Company · No. 1:20-cv-06082
- Vyskocil
- Jan. 5, 2023
Background
Suez Treatment Solutions, Inc. sued ACE American Insurance Company and Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company. The opinion states that the court was informed by the magistrate judge that the parties had reached a settlement on all issues in the case. It does not provide the claims’ underlying facts or the settlement terms.
Order
The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to the court’s calendar. A request to restore the action had to be made by February 6, 2023. The order further states that, if no such request was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice, meaning the action could not be restored.
Disposition
Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil entered the order of dismissal on January 5, 2023. The court did not decide the underlying dispute because the parties had settled it. The opinion does not state whether any party later sought restoration.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.