Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 5, 2023

Khan v. ABC Imaging of Washington, Inc.

Judge
Ona Wang
Docket
1:21-cv-10650
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureFee Petition
In one sentence

In Khan v. ABC Imaging, Judge Wang ordered the parties to submit their proposed settlement for fairness review.

Who this affects

The parties and their attorneys were required to jointly submit the proposed settlement, explain its fairness and calculation, and provide billing records supporting any request for attorneys’ fees.

What happened

In Zaman Khan v. ABC Imaging of Washington, Inc., the court was told that the parties had reached a settlement. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or the settlement’s terms.

The court required the parties to jointly submit a proposed settlement agreement by January 25, 2023. They also had to explain why the agreement was fair and reasonable and describe how they calculated the settlement amount.

Judge Wang ordered the parties to include detailed billing records supporting any request for attorneys’ fees. The order did not decide the underlying dispute or approve the settlement at that time.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Khan v. ABC Imaging of Washington, Inc. · No. 1:21-cv-10650
Judge
Ona Wang
Date
Jan. 5, 2023

Background

The court was advised that the parties had reached a settlement. The opinion does not state the claims involved, the settlement amount, or any other settlement terms.

Order

The court ordered the parties to jointly submit a proposed settlement agreement for approval by January 25, 2023. The parties were required to attach a joint letter explaining why the agreement was fair and reasonable under the standard described in Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc.

The letter also had to provide enough detail about the method used to determine the settlement amount. If the parties sought attorneys’ fees, they had to provide detailed billing records supporting that request.

Disposition

This was an order directing the parties to submit materials for settlement approval. It did not approve the settlement or decide the underlying dispute.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.