Velazquez v. The Wizard's Chest, Inc.
- Rochon
- 1:23-cv-00106
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Velazquez v. The Wizard’s Chest, Inc., Judge Rochon ordered the parties to discuss settlement, standing, and next steps.
Bryan Velazquez and The Wizard’s Chest, Inc., who must comply with the settlement-discussion and joint-letter requirements.
What happened
In Velazquez v. The Wizard’s Chest, Inc., the court ordered the parties to meet for at least one hour within 30 days after the summons and complaint are served. They must make a good-faith attempt to settle the case and discuss whether the plaintiff has met the threshold requirement of standing.
If the parties cannot settle, they must also discuss whether court-connected mediation or a settlement conference before a magistrate judge would be useful. The order does not decide whether the plaintiff has standing or resolve the underlying dispute.
Judge Jennifer L. Rochon further ordered the parties to file a joint letter within 45 days after service stating whether they settled. If they did not, the letter must request mediation or a magistrate-judge settlement conference, or ask the court to schedule an initial status conference.
The detailed version
- Velazquez v. The Wizard's Chest, Inc. · No. 1:23-cv-00106
- Rochon
- Jan. 10, 2023
Order
The case was assigned to Judge Rochon for all purposes. The court ordered the parties to meet and confer for at least one hour within 30 days after service of the summons and complaint. The parties must make a good-faith attempt to settle the action.
Standing and Further Settlement Discussions
During their discussions, the parties were directed to consider whether the plaintiff had satisfied the threshold requirement of standing, meaning the legal requirement that a person have a sufficient connection to the dispute to invoke the court’s authority. The court cited decisions from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit concerning standing. The order did not decide whether the plaintiff had standing.
If the parties could not settle the case themselves, they were also required to discuss whether additional settlement discussions through the court’s mediation program or before a magistrate judge would be productive at that time.
Required Joint Letter
Within 15 additional days—45 days after service of the summons and complaint—the parties must submit a joint letter stating whether they settled. If they did not settle, the letter must request either referral to mediation or to a magistrate judge for a settlement conference, while indicating a preference between those options, or an initial status conference.
Disposition
This order imposed settlement-discussion and case-management requirements. It did not resolve the merits of the dispute, decide the standing issue, or rule on a motion.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.