Murphy v. Riedell Shoes, Inc.
- Vyskocil
- 1:22-cv-01362
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Murphy v. Riedell Shoes, Judge Vyskocil discontinued the settled case, allowing restoration by February 10, 2023, or dismissal with prejudice.
James Murphy and Riedell Shoes, Inc.; the case was discontinued based on the parties’ settlement in principle.
What happened
In Murphy v. Riedell Shoes, Inc., the defendant told the court that the parties had reached a settlement in principle.
The court discontinued the case without costs to either party and allowed either party to ask to restore the case if the settlement was not put in writing. That request had to be made by February 10, 2023; otherwise, the dismissal would be with prejudice.
Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil issued the order on January 10, 2023.
The detailed version
- Murphy v. Riedell Shoes, Inc. · No. 1:22-cv-01362
- Vyskocil
- Jan. 10, 2023
Background The court received a letter from Riedell Shoes, Inc. stating that the parties had reached a settlement in principle. The opinion does not describe the claims or the settlement terms.
Ruling The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to the court’s calendar if the parties could not memorialize their settlement in writing. Any application to restore the action had to be made by February 10, 2023. If no application was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.