Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 10, 2023

Genesis Group, AG v. Amtel Corporation/Pond Mobile Incorporated

Judge
James Oetken
Docket
1:23-cv-00076
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureArbitration
In one sentence

In Genesis Group, AG v. Amtel Corporation/Pond Mobile Incorporated, Judge Oetken set briefing and service deadlines for a petition to confirm an arbitration award.

Who this affects

Genesis Group, AG and Amtel Corporation/Pond Mobile Incorporated, concerning the petition to confirm an arbitration award.

What happened

Genesis Group, AG filed a petition asking the court to confirm an arbitration award against Amtel Corporation/Pond Mobile Incorporated.

The court explained that petitions to confirm arbitration awards are handled similarly to motions for summary judgment. It ordered Genesis Group to file any additional supporting materials by January 24, 2023, and set deadlines for the respondent’s opposition and the petitioner’s reply.

The order also required service of the petition, supporting papers, and the order on the respondent by January 24, 2023. Judge James Oetken did not decide whether to confirm the arbitration award in this order.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Genesis Group, AG v. Amtel Corporation/Pond Mobile Incorporated · No. 1:23-cv-00076
Judge
James Oetken
Date
Jan. 10, 2023

Background

Genesis Group, AG filed a petition to confirm an arbitration award. The opinion refers to Genesis Group as the petitioner and Amtel Corporation/Pond Mobile Incorporated as the respondent.

Court’s Directions

The court stated that proceedings to confirm an arbitration award must be treated similarly to a motion for summary judgment, which is a request for judgment based on the available evidence without a full trial. The court ordered the petitioner to file and serve any additional materials supporting the petition by January 24, 2023. The respondent’s opposition, if any, was due February 7, 2023, and the petitioner’s reply, if any, was due February 14, 2023.

The court separately ordered the petitioner to serve the petition, all supporting papers, and the order on the respondent no later than January 24, 2023.

Disposition

This order set filing and service deadlines. It did not confirm or refuse to confirm the arbitration award. Judge J. Paul Oetken issued the order on January 10, 2023.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.