Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 11, 2023

Yuwono v. Poke Fidi LLC

Judge
Rochon
Docket
1:22-cv-05052
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureFlsa
In one sentence

In Yuwono v. Poke Fidi, Judge Rochon ordered the parties to discuss consenting to a magistrate judge and report their choice within two weeks.

Who this affects

The plaintiffs and defendants in Sandy Yuwono v. Poke Fidi LLC.

What happened

In Sandy Yuwono v. Poke Fidi LLC, the parties told the court that mediation had not succeeded.

The court ordered the parties to discuss whether they would agree to have all remaining proceedings handled by Magistrate Judge Willis. If they did not all agree, they had to inform the court within two weeks without identifying who withheld consent, and they had to say whether they wanted a settlement conference.

Judge Jennifer L. Rochon also reminded the parties that most settlements of claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act must receive court approval. The order did not decide the parties’ underlying claims.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Yuwono v. Poke Fidi LLC · No. 1:22-cv-05052
Judge
Rochon
Date
Jan. 11, 2023

Background

The parties notified the court that mediation had been unsuccessful. The order does not describe the underlying claims in detail, but it refers to claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act.

Order

To conserve resources, promote efficiency, and seek a faster resolution, the court ordered the parties to discuss whether they would consent under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) to having all further proceedings conducted by Magistrate Judge Willis. If both sides consented, they had to submit a completed consent form within two weeks of the order. If the court approved the form, Magistrate Judge Willis would conduct the remaining proceedings. Any appeal would go directly to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

If any party did not consent to having all further proceedings before the magistrate judge, the parties had to file a joint letter within two weeks stating that they did not consent, without identifying the party or parties who declined. The court stated that withholding consent would not result in adverse consequences. The parties also had to state whether they wanted a settlement conference before Magistrate Judge Willis.

The court reminded the parties that most settlements of Fair Labor Standards Act claims must be approved by the court, citing Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc.

Disposition and significance

This was a case-management order concerning possible consent to proceed before a magistrate judge and a possible settlement conference. It did not resolve the merits of the claims or rule on liability. The order was signed by Judge Jennifer L. Rochon.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.