Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 12, 2023

Mercer v. VIACOMCBS/PARAMOUNT

Judge
Lorna Schofield
Docket
1:22-cv-06322
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Mercer v. VIACOMCBS/PARAMOUNT, Judge Schofield ordered Marshals to serve the complaint after Mercer was allowed to proceed without prepaid fees.

Who this affects

Amirah Mercer and VIACOMCBS/PARAMOUNT; the order directs the Clerk of Court and the U.S. Marshals Service to facilitate service on the defendant.

What happened

In Mercer v. VIACOMCBS/PARAMOUNT, Amirah Mercer, who was representing herself, alleged that the defendant discriminated against her. The court had allowed her to proceed without paying court fees in advance.

The court ordered the Clerk of Court to issue a summons, prepare the service paperwork, and give it to the U.S. Marshals Service so the Marshals could serve VIACOMCBS/PARAMOUNT. The order extended the service deadline to 90 days after the summons is issued.

Judge Schofield also stated that Mercer must tell the court in writing if her address changes. The order says the case may be dismissed if she does not provide that notice and that she should request more time if service is not completed within the 90-day period.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Mercer v. VIACOMCBS/PARAMOUNT · No. 1:22-cv-06322
Judge
Lorna Schofield
Date
Jan. 12, 2023

Background

Amirah Mercer, proceeding without a lawyer, brought this action under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 and alleged that VIACOMCBS/PARAMOUNT discriminated against her. The court had previously granted Mercer permission to proceed without paying court fees in advance.

Service of Process

Because Mercer was proceeding without prepaying fees, the court explained that she could rely on the court and the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the defendant. The Clerk of Court was ordered to prepare a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form, issue a summons for VIACOMCBS/PARAMOUNT, and provide the Marshals Service with the documents needed to make service.

The order stated that the usual 90-day service period runs from the date the complaint is filed, but that Mercer could not serve the summons and complaint until the court reviewed the complaint and ordered the summons issued. The court therefore extended the service period to 90 days after the summons is issued. If service is not completed within that period, the order states that Mercer should request an extension of time.

Other Requirement and Disposition

Mercer was required to notify the court in writing if her address changes. The court stated that the action may be dismissed if she fails to do so. The Clerk was also directed to mail Mercer an information package. Judge Lorna G. Schofield entered this order directing issuance of the summons and service through the U.S. Marshals Service; the opinion does not decide whether the discrimination allegation has merit.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.