Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 13, 2023

Dupont v. United States

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:22-cv-10757
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
4
HabeasCivil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Dupont v. United States, Chief Judge Swain ordered Dupont to pay the filing fee or submit an application to proceed without prepayment.

Who this affects

Tyquan Dupont must, within 30 days of the January 13, 2023 order, pay the $5 filing fee or submit a signed application to proceed without prepaying fees. If he does not comply, the action will be dismissed; the United States was not required to respond at that time.

What happened

In Dupont v. United States, Tyquan Dupont submitted what appeared to be a petition seeking a court order concerning detention, but did not pay the required filing fee or submit an application to proceed without prepayment of fees.

The court gave Dupont 30 days to pay the $5 filing fee or submit a signed application asking to proceed without prepayment. No response from the United States was required at that time. The court said the case would be dismissed if Dupont did not comply.

Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain also denied permission to proceed without prepayment for any appeal from this order, finding that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Dupont v. United States · No. 1:22-cv-10757
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Jan. 13, 2023

Background

Tyquan Dupont, representing himself, filed what the court said appeared to be a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or the relief Dupont seeks. The petition was submitted without the required $5 filing fee and without an application to proceed without prepaying fees.

Court’s Analysis and Order

The court explained that a person filing a habeas petition must either pay the $5 filing fee or submit a signed application requesting permission to proceed without prepayment. The court ordered Dupont, within 30 days of the order’s date, to do one of those two things. If he submitted the application, it had to identify docket number 22-CV-10757 (LTS). If the court granted the application, Dupont could proceed without paying fees in advance.

The court stated that no answer from the United States was required at that time. If Dupont complied, the case would be processed under the Clerk’s Office procedures. If he did not comply within the allowed time, the action would be dismissed.

Disposition

Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain directed Dupont to pay the filing fee or submit the required application. The court also certified that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without prepayment of fees for purposes of an appeal. The order did not decide the merits of Dupont’s apparent habeas petition.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.