Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 19, 2023

Morales v. AHDS Bagel LLC

Judge
Paul Engelmayer
Docket
1:20-cv-06590
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
4
FlsaEmploymentCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Morales v. AHDS Bagel LLC, Judge Engelmayer approved the parties’ $60,000 labor-law settlement and directed the clerk to close the case.

Who this affects

The plaintiffs and defendants in the action are affected by the approved $60,000 settlement. CSM Legal, P.C. is to receive $20,718 for attorney fees and costs.

What happened

Morales v. AHDS Bagel LLC is a case under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act and New York Labor Law. The parties submitted a proposed settlement agreement for the court’s review.

The court found the agreement fair and reasonable. It noted that the agreement had no confidentiality provision and that its release was limited to claims related to the lawsuit that arose by the agreement’s effective date. The court also found the proposed attorney payment reasonable.

Judge Paul A. Engelmayer approved the agreement and directed the Clerk of Court to close the case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Morales v. AHDS Bagel LLC · No. 1:20-cv-06590
Judge
Paul Engelmayer
Date
Jan. 19, 2023

Background

The parties submitted a proposed settlement agreement in this action under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and New York Labor Law. The court explained that parties cannot privately settle FLSA claims with prejudice without approval from a district court or the Department of Labor. The court therefore reviewed whether the agreement was fair and reasonable and separately reviewed the reasonableness of the proposed attorney fees.

Settlement Terms and Court’s Analysis

The court found that the agreement did not contain a confidentiality provision that would undermine the FLSA’s remedial purposes. Although the release used broad language concerning known claims, it was limited to claims in the litigation that occurred by the agreement’s effective date.

The total settlement amount was $60,000. The defendants would pay $20,718 to CSM Legal, P.C. for attorney fees and costs. After subtracting $1,538.50 in costs, the attorneys would receive $19,179.50 from a remaining settlement sum of $58,461.50. The court stated that this fee was approximately 32% of the total settlement value and within the percentage range commonly accepted in the district.

The court also performed a lodestar cross-check, comparing the percentage-based fee with the fees calculated from counsel’s hours and rates. Counsel’s lodestar was $8,390, producing a multiplier of approximately 2.4. The court accepted plaintiffs’ counsel’s hours and fees as reasonable and found the multiplier within the range generally allowed in the district.

Disposition

The court approved the settlement agreement. The Clerk of Court was directed to close the case. The order was signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.