Farsura v. QC Terme US Corp
- Loretta Preska
- 1:21-cv-09030
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 3
In Farsura v. QC Terme US Corp., Judge Lehrburger granted a request to seal commercially sensitive business documents.
QC Terme US, the dismissed Italian defendants, the plaintiffs, and members of the public seeking access to the listed court filings.
What happened
In Farsura v. QC Terme US Corp., QC Terme US and the dismissed Italian defendants asked the court to seal documents filed with opposition to the plaintiffs’ request to amend their complaint.
The requested documents contained non-public financial information, business plans, pricing information, contracts, loan and credit details, bank statements, invoices, and a legal engagement letter. The plaintiffs did not object to the sealing request.
Judge Robert W. Lehrburger granted the request and ordered the listed documents sealed. The order addressed access to filed documents and did not decide the underlying dispute.
The detailed version
- Farsura v. QC Terme US Corp · No. 1:21-cv-09030
- Loretta Preska
- Jan. 25, 2023
Background
The plaintiffs had filed a motion for permission to amend their complaint. QC Terme US and the dismissed Italian defendants filed papers opposing that motion, along with exhibits under seal. They then asked the court to seal Exhibit E to one filing and specified documents associated with another filing.
The moving parties said the documents contained commercially sensitive information, including financial information about the QC Terme business, a proposed business plan, financial projections, anticipated pricing, bank statements, invoices, contracts, loan and credit information, and a legal engagement letter. They also stated that the documents had been designated confidential under the parties’ protective order and that the plaintiffs did not object after being informed of the planned sealing request.
Court’s ruling
The court granted the request to seal all of the listed documents. The opinion explained that documents filed with a court may be subject to a public right of access, but that commercially sensitive business information can justify sealing when the request is appropriately limited. The court’s order concerned whether the documents would be available to the public; it did not resolve the parties’ underlying claims or the motion to amend the complaint.
Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.