Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund v…
Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund, and Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund v. 809 Solutions LLC
- Lewis Liman
- 1:22-cv-10632
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Trustees v. 809 Solutions, Judge Liman gave 809 Solutions until February 9, 2023, to oppose confirmation of an arbitration award.
The petitioners, 809 Solutions LLC, and the court’s process for deciding whether to confirm the arbitration award.
What happened
Trustees of several funds and the Carpenter Contractor Alliance of Metropolitan New York asked the court to confirm an arbitration award against 809 Solutions LLC, doing business as Erector Masters. Judge Lewis J. Liman issued the order on January 26, 2023.
The court said the response deadline had passed and that it intended to treat the petition as unopposed unless 809 Solutions filed a legal memorandum opposing it by February 9, 2023. The order directed the petitioners to serve a copy on 809 Solutions.
Judge Liman did not state in this order that he confirmed or denied the arbitration award. The order instead set out how the court would proceed if 809 Solutions did not respond.
The detailed version
- Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund v… · No. 1:22-cv-10632
- Lewis Liman
- Jan. 26, 2023
Background
The petitioners filed a petition seeking confirmation of an arbitration award against 809 Solutions LLC, doing business as Erector Masters. The opinion states that the petition was filed on December 16, 2023, although the order is dated January 26, 2023.
Court’s Action
The court explained that proceedings to confirm arbitration awards are treated similarly to motions for summary judgment. Because the time for 809 Solutions to respond had expired, the court stated that it intended to treat the petition as unopposed unless 809 Solutions filed a memorandum of law opposing the petition by February 9, 2023. The court directed the petitioners to serve the order on 809 Solutions.
Disposition
This order did not state that the court granted or denied the petition or confirmed the arbitration award. It set a deadline and described the court’s intended treatment of the petition if no opposition was filed. Judge Lewis J. Liman issued the order.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.