Lawal v. Game-Set-Match, Inc.
- Vyskocil
- 1:22-cv-08710
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Lawal v. Game-Set-Match, Judge Vyskocil discontinued the action after a settlement in principle, allowing restoration by March 27, 2023.
Rafia Lawal, Game-Set-Match, Inc., and the putative class members represented in the action; the opinion does not describe the settlement terms or identify which class members would receive benefits.
What happened
In Lawal v. Game-Set-Match, Inc., the defendant told the court that the parties had reached a settlement in principle. The opinion does not describe the settlement’s terms.
The court discontinued the action without costs to either party and allowed it to be restored if the parties could not put their settlement in writing and applied by March 27, 2023. If no application was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice.
Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil issued the order on January 26, 2023.
The detailed version
- Lawal v. Game-Set-Match, Inc. · No. 1:22-cv-08710
- Vyskocil
- Jan. 26, 2023
Background
Rafia Lawal brought the action on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated. Game-Set-Match, Inc. informed the court by letter that the parties had reached a settlement in principle. The opinion does not provide the settlement’s terms.
Court’s Action
The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring it to the court’s calendar. Restoration was permitted if the parties were unable to memorialize their settlement in writing and an application to restore the action was made by March 27, 2023. The order states that if no application was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice.
Result
The court discontinued the action under those conditions. Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil signed the order.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.