Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 26, 2023

Hamilton v. Enterprise Holdings inc.

Judge
Paul Gardephe
Docket
1:22-cv-10860
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
4
Civil ProcedureCivil RightsEmploymentPro Se
In one sentence

In Hamilton v. Enterprise Holdings, Judge Gardephe ordered U.S. Marshals service of Hamilton’s discrimination suit after he was allowed to proceed without prepaying fees.

Who this affects

Demezz Hamilton, Enterprise Holdings Inc., Jessica Sirow, the Clerk of Court, and the U.S. Marshals Service.

What happened

In Demezz Hamilton v. Enterprise Holdings Inc., d/b/a Enterprise Rent-A-Car, and Jessica Sirow, Hamilton alleges that the defendants discriminated against him because of his race and national origin. He brought claims under federal and New York human-rights laws and is representing himself.

Because Hamilton was allowed to proceed without prepaying court fees, the court ordered the Clerk of Court and the U.S. Marshals Service to prepare and serve the summonses and complaint on Enterprise and Sirow. The court extended the service deadline to 90 days after the summonses are issued.

Judge Paul G. Gardephe did not decide whether Hamilton’s discrimination claims are valid. The order directs service and requires Hamilton to notify the court if his address changes; the court may dismiss the case if he does not do so.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Hamilton v. Enterprise Holdings inc. · No. 1:22-cv-10860
Judge
Paul Gardephe
Date
Jan. 26, 2023

Background

Demezz Hamilton brings a self-represented lawsuit against Enterprise Holdings Inc., doing business as Enterprise Rent-A-Car, and Jessica Sirow, identified as an Enterprise area rental manager. Hamilton alleges discrimination based on race and national origin under 42 U.S.C. § 1981, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and the New York State and New York City Human Rights Laws.

The court had previously granted Hamilton permission to proceed without prepaying court fees. This status is commonly called proceeding in forma pauperis, or IFP.

Service Order

Because Hamilton was granted IFP status, the court explained that he could rely on the court and the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the defendants. The court directed the Clerk of Court to issue summonses for Enterprise and Sirow, complete a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form for each defendant using the service addresses, and give the Marshals Service the documents needed for service.

The court stated that the complaint must be served within 90 days after the summonses are issued. If service is not completed by then, Hamilton should request an extension of time. The court also directed the Clerk to mail Hamilton a copy of the order and an information package.

Other Requirement and Effect

Hamilton must notify the court in writing if his address changes. The court stated that it may dismiss the action if he fails to do so.

Judge Paul G. Gardephe’s order concerns service of the lawsuit and related administrative requirements. It does not decide the merits of Hamilton’s discrimination allegations or the defendants’ potential defenses.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.