Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 26, 2023

In Re: Ex parte Application of Tracey Amon

Judge
John Koeltl
Docket
1:22-cv-10248
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
DiscoveryCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In re Tracey Amon, Judge Aaron authorized discovery from American Express for proceedings in Switzerland.

Who this affects

Tracey Amon, American Express Company, and the attorneys authorized to issue and serve the subpoena.

What happened

In re: Ex parte Application of Tracey Amon involved Tracey Amon’s request for information from American Express Company for use in multiple proceedings in Switzerland. She asked the court to authorize the discovery without notifying the parties in those proceedings.

The court found that the legal requirements for the request were satisfied: American Express is located in the district, the information was intended for use in foreign proceedings, and Amon was an interested person. The court also found that the relevant Supreme Court factors favored granting the request.

The court granted Amon’s application, authorized service of the attached subpoena, appointed Kevin Murphy and certain other attorneys to issue and serve it, and directed American Express to respond while allowing it to raise objections. Judge Stewart D. Aaron issued the order and retained jurisdiction as needed to enforce the subpoena.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
In Re: Ex parte Application of Tracey Amon · No. 1:22-cv-10248
Judge
John Koeltl
Date
Jan. 26, 2023

Background

Tracey Amon filed an application under 28 U.S.C. § 1782, a federal law allowing a person to seek discovery in the United States for use in a proceeding before a foreign tribunal. The requested discovery was from American Express Company. The application stated that the discovery would be used in multiple foreign proceedings pending in Switzerland. The application was made without prior notice to the parties in those foreign proceedings, and the court was later advised that those parties did not intend to appear in this matter.

Court’s analysis

The court found that the statutory requirements for § 1782 discovery were satisfied because:

- American Express resides or is found in the Southern District of New York; - the requested discovery was for use in proceedings before a foreign tribunal in Switzerland; and - Amon was an interested person.

The court also applied the factors identified by the Supreme Court in Intel Corp. v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. and found that they favored granting the application. The court further found a sufficient basis for authorizing the discovery. It concluded that granting the application without prior notice was permissible.

Order

The court granted Amon’s application. It authorized her to serve the subpoena attached to the application. The court appointed Kevin Murphy, and any other attorney affiliated with Wuersh & Gering LLP who was admitted to practice in the Southern District of New York, to issue, sign, and serve the subpoena on American Express.

American Express was directed to respond under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the court’s Local Rules, while retaining the ability to assert any objection it deemed appropriate. The court also retained jurisdiction as necessary to carry out the subpoena’s terms. Stewart D. Aaron, United States Magistrate Judge, signed the order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.