Cuaya v. Aunt Jake's
- Katharine Parker
- 1:22-cv-09236
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Cuaya v. Aunt Jake’s, Judge Parker approved the parties’ Fair Labor Standards Act settlement and discontinued the action with prejudice and without costs.
Martin Cuaya, the other plaintiffs represented as similarly situated, the defendants, and plaintiffs’ counsel were affected by the settlement approval and closure of the action.
What happened
Cuaya v. Aunt Jake’s involved claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act and New York Labor Law brought by Martin Cuaya individually and for others similarly situated. The parties reached an agreement in principle and asked the court to approve their proposed settlement.
The court reviewed the parties’ submissions and found that the agreement was fair, reasonable, and adequate to address the claims and compensate the plaintiffs’ lawyers for their legal fees. The court did not include the settlement’s terms in its order and did not retain jurisdiction to enforce the agreement.
Judge Katharine H. Parker approved the settlement, discontinued the action with prejudice and without costs, and directed the Clerk of Court to close the case.
The detailed version
- Cuaya v. Aunt Jake's · No. 1:22-cv-09236
- Katharine Parker
- Jan. 27, 2023
Background
Martin Cuaya brought this action individually and on behalf of others similarly situated under the Fair Labor Standards Act and New York Labor Law. The parties consented to the court’s authority under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). After reaching an agreement in principle, they submitted a proposed settlement agreement and a letter explaining why they believed the settlement was fair, reasonable, and adequate.
Court’s analysis
Because the action included claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act, the court reviewed the settlement for fairness. The court considered the parties’ submissions, their explanations, and the totality of the relevant circumstances. It found that the proposed agreement was fair, reasonable, and adequate both to address Cuaya’s claims and to compensate plaintiffs’ counsel for legal fees.
The court also clarified that its order did not incorporate the settlement’s terms. Because the settlement did not provide that the court would retain jurisdiction to enforce it, and because the court did not independently decide to retain jurisdiction, the approval did not create continuing federal-court jurisdiction to enforce the agreement.
Disposition
Judge Katharine H. Parker approved the proposed settlement. As a result, the action was discontinued with prejudice and without costs. The Clerk of Court was directed to close the case. The opinion does not state the settlement amount or describe the agreement’s specific terms.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.