Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 27, 2023

Nochimson v. Oasis Luxe Management & Co. Inc.

Judge
Paul Engelmayer
Docket
1:22-cv-07197
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
4
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

Nochimson v. Oasis Luxe Management, Judge Cave granted permission to serve Michael G. Memon through his counsel after ordinary service attempts failed.

Who this affects

The ruling affects Debra Nochimson’s ability to serve Michael G. Memon and permits service through Memon’s counsel of record, Sullivan & Worcester LLP. It also requires Nochimson to complete that service and report its status by February 27, 2023.

What happened

In Nochimson v. Oasis Luxe Management & Co. Inc., Debra Nochimson asked to serve Michael G. Memon by delivering the summons and complaint to his counsel of record, Sullivan & Worcester LLP. Process servers had unsuccessfully tried to serve Memon at a business address and a residential address.

The court found that traditional service was impracticable and that serving Memon’s counsel was reasonably likely to inform him about the lawsuit. The court therefore granted Nochimson’s request and extended her time to serve Memon through February 27, 2023.

Judge Sarah L. Cave granted the letter-motion and ordered Nochimson to serve Memon in the authorized manner and file a status letter by February 27, 2023.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Nochimson v. Oasis Luxe Management & Co. Inc. · No. 1:22-cv-07197
Judge
Paul Engelmayer
Date
Jan. 27, 2023

Background

Debra Nochimson sued Oasis Luxe Management & Co. Inc. and Michael G. Memon in a proposed collective action under the Fair Labor Standards Act. Nochimson served Oasis through an authorized agent of the New York Secretary of State. She had not been able to serve Memon, despite process servers’ unsuccessful attempts at the business address listed in the summons and at a residential address.

Nochimson then asked for permission to serve Memon by serving his counsel of record, Sullivan & Worcester LLP. The opinion states that Paul A. Engelmayer had referred the matter to Magistrate Judge Sarah L. Cave for general pretrial supervision.

Legal standard

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(e) allows service on an individual under the law of the state where the federal court is located. Under New York Civil Practice Law and Rules section 308(5), a court may direct an alternative method of service when the usual methods are impracticable. The alternative method must also be reasonably calculated to inform the defendant about the lawsuit and give the defendant an opportunity to respond.

Ruling

Judge Sarah L. Cave found that Nochimson had shown that traditional service on Memon was impracticable. The court also found that serving Sullivan, Memon’s counsel of record, was reasonably calculated to inform Memon of the action. The court held that Nochimson could serve Memon by delivering the summons and complaint to Sullivan.

The court granted the letter-motion. It extended Nochimson’s time to serve Memon through February 27, 2023, and ordered her by that date to complete service in the authorized manner and file a status letter reporting its status.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.