Nochimson v. Oasis Luxe Management & Co. Inc.
- Paul Engelmayer
- 1:22-cv-07197
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 4
Nochimson v. Oasis Luxe Management, Judge Cave granted permission to serve Michael G. Memon through his counsel after ordinary service attempts failed.
The ruling affects Debra Nochimson’s ability to serve Michael G. Memon and permits service through Memon’s counsel of record, Sullivan & Worcester LLP. It also requires Nochimson to complete that service and report its status by February 27, 2023.
What happened
In Nochimson v. Oasis Luxe Management & Co. Inc., Debra Nochimson asked to serve Michael G. Memon by delivering the summons and complaint to his counsel of record, Sullivan & Worcester LLP. Process servers had unsuccessfully tried to serve Memon at a business address and a residential address.
The court found that traditional service was impracticable and that serving Memon’s counsel was reasonably likely to inform him about the lawsuit. The court therefore granted Nochimson’s request and extended her time to serve Memon through February 27, 2023.
Judge Sarah L. Cave granted the letter-motion and ordered Nochimson to serve Memon in the authorized manner and file a status letter by February 27, 2023.
The detailed version
- Nochimson v. Oasis Luxe Management & Co. Inc. · No. 1:22-cv-07197
- Paul Engelmayer
- Jan. 27, 2023
Background
Debra Nochimson sued Oasis Luxe Management & Co. Inc. and Michael G. Memon in a proposed collective action under the Fair Labor Standards Act. Nochimson served Oasis through an authorized agent of the New York Secretary of State. She had not been able to serve Memon, despite process servers’ unsuccessful attempts at the business address listed in the summons and at a residential address.
Nochimson then asked for permission to serve Memon by serving his counsel of record, Sullivan & Worcester LLP. The opinion states that Paul A. Engelmayer had referred the matter to Magistrate Judge Sarah L. Cave for general pretrial supervision.
Legal standard
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(e) allows service on an individual under the law of the state where the federal court is located. Under New York Civil Practice Law and Rules section 308(5), a court may direct an alternative method of service when the usual methods are impracticable. The alternative method must also be reasonably calculated to inform the defendant about the lawsuit and give the defendant an opportunity to respond.
Ruling
Judge Sarah L. Cave found that Nochimson had shown that traditional service on Memon was impracticable. The court also found that serving Sullivan, Memon’s counsel of record, was reasonably calculated to inform Memon of the action. The court held that Nochimson could serve Memon by delivering the summons and complaint to Sullivan.
The court granted the letter-motion. It extended Nochimson’s time to serve Memon through February 27, 2023, and ordered her by that date to complete service in the authorized manner and file a status letter reporting its status.
Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.