Lundberg v. Federal Express Corporation
- Vernon Broderick
- 1:22-cv-00167
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Lundberg v. Federal Express Corporation, Judge Broderick ordered the parties to submit their wage-settlement terms for court review.
The parties to the FLSA case—Richard Lundberg and Federal Express Corporation—were required to submit the settlement terms and supporting materials to the court.
What happened
In Lundberg v. Federal Express Corporation, the parties told the court that they had reached a settlement after a settlement conference in this federal wage-law case.
Judge Broderick explained that private settlements of claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act require approval by the court or the Department of Labor. The court must decide whether the settlement is fair and reasonable by considering factors such as possible recovery, litigation burdens and risks, bargaining, and possible fraud or collusion.
Judge Broderick ordered the parties to submit the settlement terms within 30 days, along with a joint letter of no more than five pages explaining why the agreement is fair and reasonable. If the agreement includes attorney’s fees, they must also provide evidence supporting the fee award, including detailed billing records.
The detailed version
- Lundberg v. Federal Express Corporation · No. 1:22-cv-00167
- Vernon Broderick
- Jan. 27, 2023
Background
Richard Lundberg brought this Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) case on his own behalf and on behalf of similarly situated people against Federal Express Corporation. The court was advised that the parties reached a settlement after a settlement conference before Magistrate Judge Parker. The order does not state the settlement’s terms or approve the settlement.
Legal standard
The court stated that parties may not privately settle FLSA claims without approval from the district court or the Department of Labor. The court must determine whether the proposed agreement is a fair and reasonable compromise of disputed issues. It must consider the totality of the circumstances, including the plaintiff’s possible recovery; the burdens and expenses the settlement would avoid; the parties’ litigation risks; whether the agreement resulted from arm’s-length bargaining between experienced counsel; and the possibility of fraud or collusion.
When a settlement includes attorney’s fees, the court must separately evaluate whether those fees are reasonable. The parties must provide a factual basis for any fee award, including contemporaneous billing records identifying each attorney’s date of work, hours spent, and work performed.
Order
Judge Vernon S. Broderick ordered the parties to provide the settlement terms within 30 days so the court could review whether they comply with the FLSA and reflect a fair and reasonable compromise. The parties must also submit a joint letter of no more than five pages discussing why the settlement is fair and reasonable, including information about the identified evaluation factors. If the agreement provides for attorney’s fees, the parties must submit supporting evidence and billing records. The order did not grant final approval of the settlement.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.