Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 27, 2023

James v. The State University of New York

Judge
Rearden
Docket
1:22-cv-04856
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
21
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In James v. The State University of New York, Judge Rearden reassigned the case and ordered a status letter, without deciding the claims.

Who this affects

Jeremy Allan James, The State University of New York, and the parties and counsel handling the case are affected by the reassignment, continuing deadlines, adjourned district-judge appearances, required joint status letter, and attached filing and case-management rules.

What happened

James v. The State University of New York was reassigned to a different district judge. The order kept earlier orders, dates, and deadlines in place, while postponing previously scheduled appearances or conferences before the district judge.

The parties must confer and prepare a joint status letter within three weeks. The defendant must file and serve it on pro se plaintiff Jeremy Allan James. The letter must address the claims and defenses, jurisdiction, deadlines, pending motions or appeals, discovery, settlement discussions, possible alternative dispute resolution, and the estimated trial length.

Judge Jennifer H. Rearden also directed the Clerk to mail the order and her civil-case rules to James. The order did not decide the claims, defenses, or any other issue on the merits.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
James v. The State University of New York · No. 1:22-cv-04856
Judge
Rearden
Date
Jan. 27, 2023

Nature of the Order

This is a notice of reassignment and case-management order. It does not rule on the merits of Jeremy Allan James’s claims against The State University of New York. The opinion text does not describe the claims or defenses in detail.

Reassignment and Existing Dates

The case was reassigned to Judge Jennifer H. Rearden. Unless the court orders otherwise, all prior orders, dates, and deadlines remain effective despite the reassignment. Conferences or oral arguments before, or directed by, the Magistrate Judge must proceed as previously ordered. Previously scheduled appearances or conferences before the district judge are adjourned until the court provides further notice.

Required Joint Status Letter

Within three weeks after the order’s filing, the parties must confer and prepare a joint letter updating the court on the case’s status. The defendants must file the letter electronically and serve it on pro se plaintiff Jeremy Allan James. The letter may not exceed five double-spaced pages and must separately address, when relevant:

- counsel and current contact information; - the nature of the claims and principal defenses; - the basis for federal jurisdiction and venue, including citizenship information required in diversity cases; - existing deadlines and cutoff dates; - previously scheduled but unfinished conferences or arguments; - outstanding motions and the relief sought; - pending appeals; - discovery completed and discovery still needed for meaningful settlement discussions; - the status of settlement discussions without revealing exact offers or demands; - discussions about alternative dispute resolution, such as a settlement conference, mediation, or a private mediator; - the estimated trial length; and - other information that could help the court move the case forward, including dispositive or novel issues.

If the case has already been settled or otherwise terminated, the parties do not need to submit the letter or appear if they file appropriate proof of termination before the submission deadline.

Attached Individual Rules

The order also provides Judge Rearden’s rules for civil cases and civil cases involving pro se parties. Among other things, those rules direct pro se parties to communicate with the Pro Se Office rather than directly with chambers, require them to keep a current mailing address, describe acceptable filing methods, establish procedures for discovery disputes and motions, and set requirements for conferences, pretrial filings, sealing or redacting documents, protective orders, and default-judgment requests. The Clerk must mail the order and the rules to James.

Disposition and Classification

The court entered administrative and case-management directives concerning reassignment, scheduling, and a status update. It did not grant or deny a merits motion, dismiss the case, enter judgment, or decide the parties’ underlying legal dispute.

The authoritative version

Read the full 21-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.