Hibbert v. The State of New York
- Gregory Woods
- 1:22-cv-08257
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Hibbert v. City of New York, Judge Woods ordered the City Law Department to identify John Doe defendants and denied a fee-free appeal.
Conroy Hibbert, Jr.; the unidentified John Doe defendants; and the New York City Law Department, which was ordered to provide identifying and service information.
What happened
In Conroy Hibbert, Jr. v. The City of New York, the court said an earlier order required the New York City Law Department to identify the John Doe defendants, their badge numbers, and addresses where they could be served. The information was due within 60 days, but nothing about it had been filed on the docket, and the court could not tell whether the information had been sent to Hibbert.
The court ordered the Law Department to file a letter by February 7, 2023, identifying the John Doe defendants and stating whether it had already provided the information to Hibbert. If it had not, the Law Department had to provide the information to Hibbert at the same time and file an affidavit stating when and how it did so. The court said it would decide Hibbert’s deadline for filing an amended complaint after receiving the filing.
Judge Gregory H. Woods also certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without paying court fees. The order did not decide the underlying claims.
The detailed version
- Hibbert v. The State of New York · No. 1:22-cv-08257
- Gregory Woods
- Jan. 30, 2023
Background
On October 26, 2022, the court ordered the New York City Law Department to identify each John Doe defendant Hibbert sought to sue, provide each defendant’s badge number, and provide an address where each defendant could be served. The Law Department was required to give that information to Hibbert and the court within 60 days. After the information was provided, Hibbert would have 30 additional days to file an amended complaint naming the John Doe defendants.
The 60-day deadline was December 25, 2022. The court stated that no information about the identities and badge numbers of the John Doe defendants had been filed on the docket and that it was unclear whether the information had been sent to Hibbert.
Order
The court directed the New York City Law Department to file a letter by February 7, 2023. The letter had to identify the John Doe defendants, their badge numbers, and the addresses where they could be served. It also had to state whether the information had previously been provided to Hibbert.
If the information had not already been provided directly to Hibbert, the Law Department had to provide it to him at the same time it provided the information to the court. The Law Department also had to file an affidavit stating the date and method of delivery. The court would evaluate Hibbert’s deadline to file an amended complaint after receiving the Law Department’s filing.
Appeal ruling
The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith. It therefore denied permission to appeal without paying court fees. The Clerk of Court was directed to mail Hibbert a copy of the order. The order addressed case administration and the potential appeal; it did not resolve the underlying claims.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.