Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 30, 2023

BMaddox Enterprises LLC v. Oskouie

Full caption

BMaddox Enterprises LLC v. Milad Oskouie, Osko M Ltd., and Platinum Avenue Holdings Pty, Ltd.

Judge
Ronnie Abrams
Docket
1:17-cv-01889-RA-SLC
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Fee PetitionCivil Procedure
In one sentence

BMaddox Enterprises LLC v. Milad Oskouie: Judge Abrams awarded $223,560 in attorneys’ fees after adopting an unopposed recommendation.

Who this affects

BMaddox Enterprises LLC received the attorneys’ fee award; the ruling concerns the defendants in the same litigation, including Milad Oskouie, Osko M Ltd., and Platinum Avenue Holdings Pty, Ltd.

What happened

In BMaddox Enterprises LLC v. Milad Oskouie, BMaddox asked for attorneys’ fees and costs under the Copyright Act after earlier obtaining partial summary judgment against Milad Oskouie and default judgment against two other defendants.

The request was referred to Magistrate Judge Cave, who recommended granting attorneys’ fees. No party objected to that recommendation, so the court reviewed it for clear error and found none.

Judge Ronnie Abrams adopted the recommendation in full and awarded BMaddox Enterprises LLC $223,560 in attorneys’ fees. The court also directed the Clerk of Court to close the pending motion.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
BMaddox Enterprises LLC v. Oskouie · No. 1:17-cv-01889-RA-SLC
Judge
Ronnie Abrams
Date
Jan. 30, 2023

Background

On August 18, 2021, the court granted in part BMaddox Enterprises LLC’s motion for summary judgment against Milad Oskouie and granted BMaddox’s motion for default judgment against Osko M Ltd. and Platinum Avenue Holdings Pty, Ltd. On April 18, 2022, BMaddox filed an unopposed motion for attorneys’ fees and costs under Section 505 of the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. § 505. The court referred that motion to Magistrate Judge Cave.

Report and Recommendation

Judge Cave issued a report and recommendation on January 6, 2023. No party filed an objection. Under the governing procedure, when no objection is filed, the district court may adopt the recommendation if the record shows no clear error—that is, no obvious mistake.

Ruling

Judge Abrams reviewed the report for clear error and found none. The court adopted Judge Cave’s report and recommendation in its entirety. It awarded BMaddox Enterprises LLC $223,560.00 in attorneys’ fees and directed the Clerk of Court to terminate the motion listed at docket number 236. The opinion does not state that any separate amount for costs was awarded.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.