Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 31, 2023

Encarnacion v. SJW Sushi Corp.

Judge
Katharine Parker
Docket
1:22-cv-02200
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
FlsaCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Encarnacion v. SJW Sushi Corp., Judge Parker approved the Fair Labor Standards Act settlement and dismissed the case with prejudice and without costs.

Who this affects

Erik Encarnacion, SJW Sushi Corp., and Ju Hee Lee are affected by the approved settlement and the case’s discontinuance with prejudice and without costs. The court retained jurisdiction to enforce the settlement if necessary.

What happened

In Encarnacion v. SJW Sushi Corp., Erik Encarnacion brought a case under the Fair Labor Standards Act against SJW Sushi Corp. and Ju Hee Lee. The parties reached an agreement in principle to resolve the case and asked the court to approve it.

The court reviewed the proposed agreement and the parties’ explanation of why it was fair, reasonable, and adequate. The court also agreed to keep authority over the case so it could enforce the settlement if necessary.

Judge Katharine H. Parker approved the settlement, including its compensation for Encarnacion’s claims and his lawyer’s fees. The court then discontinued the action with prejudice and without costs and directed the clerk to close the case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Encarnacion v. SJW Sushi Corp. · No. 1:22-cv-02200
Judge
Katharine Parker
Date
Jan. 31, 2023

Background

Erik Encarnacion brought this action under the Fair Labor Standards Act against SJW Sushi Corp. and Ju Hee Lee. The parties consented to the magistrate judge’s jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). They reached an agreement in principle and submitted a proposed settlement for court approval, along with a letter explaining why they believed the agreement was fair, reasonable, and adequate.

Court’s Review

Because Fair Labor Standards Act settlements require judicial fairness review, the court examined whether the proposed agreement was a reasonable compromise of the claims. The court considered the parties’ submissions, the settlement’s terms, the representations in their letter, and the court’s familiarity with the strengths and weaknesses of the parties’ positions.

Ruling

The court found that the proposed settlement was fair, reasonable, and adequate both to address Encarnacion’s claims and to compensate his counsel for legal fees. Judge Katharine H. Parker therefore approved the agreement. At the parties’ request, the court retained jurisdiction to enforce the settlement if necessary. The action was discontinued with prejudice and without costs, and the clerk was directed to close the case.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.