Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 1, 2023

Mitchell v. BJs Wholesale Club

Judge
Katherine Failla
Docket
1:23-cv-00724
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Mitchell v. BJS Wholesale Club, Judge Failla transferred the improperly removed case from the Southern to the Eastern District of New York.

Who this affects

The parties to the case—Audrey Mitchell and BJS Wholesale Club—are affected by the transfer from the Southern District of New York to the Eastern District of New York. The opinion does not resolve the underlying claims.

What happened

Mitchell v. BJS Wholesale Club began in New York state court in Queens County. BJS Wholesale Club moved the case to the Southern District of New York, but Queens County belongs to the Eastern District of New York for this purpose.

The court found that the removal went to the wrong federal district. It explained that the case did not need to return to state court and be removed again; transferring it directly would avoid delay and expense.

Judge Katherine Polk Failla ordered the Clerk of Court to remove the case from the Southern District of New York’s docket and transfer it to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Mitchell v. BJs Wholesale Club · No. 1:23-cv-00724
Judge
Katherine Failla
Date
Feb. 1, 2023

Background

BJS Wholesale Club removed the case from the Supreme Court of New York, Queens County, to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York under 28 U.S.C. § 1441. Removal is the process of moving a case from state court to federal court.

Reasoning

The court held that the case had been removed to the wrong federal district. Under the removal statute, a case must be removed to the federal district covering the place where the state-court action is pending. The Eastern District of New York covers Queens County.

The court explained that removal to the wrong district is an improper-venue problem, not a jurisdictional defect. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a), a federal court may transfer a case filed in the wrong district to a district where it could have been brought when doing so serves the interests of justice. The court also reasoned that transferring the case directly was preferable to sending it back to state court for another removal, which would cause additional delay and expense.

Disposition

Judge Katherine Polk Failla ordered the Clerk of Court to remove the case from the Southern District of New York’s docket and transfer it to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. The opinion addresses the proper federal venue and does not decide the underlying claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.