Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 1, 2023

Christian Dior Couture SA v. Lin

Judge
Alvin Hellerstein
Docket
1:22-cv-10716
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Christian Dior Couture SA v. Lin, Judge Hellerstein provisionally allowed filing under seal and directed the Clerk to close the case.

Who this affects

Christian Dior Couture SA and the named defendants were affected because the case was provisionally filed under seal, access to the order was restricted to the selected party viewing level, and the Clerk was directed to close the case.

What happened

In Christian Dior Couture SA v. Lin, Christian Dior Couture SA asked to file a new civil case under seal using paper filings. The defendants named in the caption were Xiaole Lin, Timi Gift Shop, Inc., Shun Miao Ding, Guo Lin Han, Xiaowei Gao, Xingyun Hu, Ming Li, Xiuqian Chi, and John and Jane Does 1–190.

The court found sufficient cause under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(d) and allowed the case to be filed under seal provisionally. It directed the parties to follow the court’s sealed-filing instructions, said the order could be reconsidered by the assigned district judge, and directed the Clerk to restrict access to the order and close the case.

Judge Alvin Hellerstein entered the order on December 19, 2022.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Christian Dior Couture SA v. Lin · No. 1:22-cv-10716
Judge
Alvin Hellerstein
Date
Feb. 1, 2023

Background

Christian Dior Couture SA moved to file a new civil case under seal, using traditional paper filing. The caption names Xiaole Lin, Timi Gift Shop, Inc., Shun Miao Ding, Guo Lin Han, Xiaowei Gao, Xingyun Hu, Ming Li, Xiuqian Chi, and John and Jane Does 1–190 as defendants.

Ruling

The court found sufficient cause under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(d) to order the case filed under seal. It ordered that the case could be filed under seal provisionally. The parties were directed to follow the sealing instructions in the court’s Electronic Case Filing Rules and Instructions, Rule 6.14, and submit the case-initiating documents to the Clerk in paper form.

The order stated that the District Court judge assigned to the matter could reconsider it. The Clerk was directed to restrict access to the order to the selected party viewing level and close the case.

Classification

This is a procedural order concerning the filing and sealing of a civil case. It does not decide the underlying dispute between the parties.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.