Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 6, 2023

Terry v. Carter

Judge
Gregory Woods
Docket
1:21-cv-08995
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil RightsCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Terry v. Carter, Judge Gregory Woods entered judgment for defendants after Kevin Terry failed to show that prison grievance procedures were unavailable.

Who this affects

Kevin Terry and defendants Warden Carter, Captain Guerra, 3-AA Housing Unit Captain, Captain John Doe Intake Supervising Captain, and Captain Horton.

What happened

Terry v. Carter involved Kevin Terry’s claims against Warden Carter, Captain Guerra, the 3-AA Housing Unit Captain, Captain John Doe Intake Supervising Captain, and Captain Horton. The court had ruled that Terry did not complete the prison grievance process required by the Prison Litigation Reform Act.

The court gave Terry until February 3, 2023, to send a letter explaining whether the grievance system was unavailable to him. Terry did not file the letter.

Because Terry missed that deadline, Judge Gregory Woods entered judgment for the defendants and closed the case. The court also said an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied Terry permission to appeal without paying filing fees.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Terry v. Carter · No. 1:21-cv-08995
Judge
Gregory Woods
Date
Feb. 6, 2023

Background

Kevin Terry sued Warden Carter, Captain Guerra, the 3-AA Housing Unit Captain, Captain John Doe Intake Supervising Captain, and Captain Horton. The judgment refers to the court’s January 17, 2023 opinion, which held that Terry had not exhausted his administrative remedies under the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Exhaustion means completing the required prison grievance process before bringing the lawsuit.

Opportunity to Respond

The court gave Terry an opportunity to submit a letter describing any problems that made the prison grievance system unavailable. The court stated that it would dismiss the action if Terry did not submit the letter by February 3, 2023. The judgment states that Terry had not filed the letter by the time of the February 6 order.

Ruling

The court entered judgment for the defendants and closed the case. It also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied Terry permission to appeal without paying filing fees. The judgment does not state that the court decided the underlying claims on their merits; it rests on the exhaustion issue and Terry’s failure to submit the requested letter.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.