Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 6, 2023

Terry v. Carter

Judge
Gregory Woods
Docket
1:21-cv-08995
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureCivil Rights
In one sentence

In Terry v. Carter, Judge Woods ordered judgment for the defendants after Terry did not respond about whether the prison grievance process was unavailable.

Who this affects

The order affected Kevin Terry and the defendants by directing entry of judgment for the defendants and closure of the case; it also denied Terry permission to proceed without paying appeal fees.

What happened

In Terry v. Carter, the court had previously ruled that Kevin Terry failed to complete the required prison grievance process under the Prison Litigation Reform Act. The court gave Terry an opportunity to explain whether that process was unavailable to him.

The court required Terry to submit a letter by February 3, 2023. The order states that Terry had not submitted the letter by February 6.

Judge Woods directed the Clerk of Court to enter judgment for the defendants and close the case. The court also ruled that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied Terry permission to proceed without paying fees for an appeal.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Terry v. Carter · No. 1:21-cv-08995
Judge
Gregory Woods
Date
Feb. 6, 2023

Background

The court stated that it had issued an earlier opinion on January 17, 2023. In that opinion, the court held that Kevin Terry had not exhausted the administrative remedies required by the Prison Litigation Reform Act. In plain terms, the court found that Terry had not completed the prison grievance process before pursuing this case.

The earlier opinion gave Terry an opportunity to submit a letter addressing whether the prison grievance system was unavailable to him. The court set February 3, 2023, as the deadline and stated that it would dismiss the action if Terry did not submit the letter. This order states that Terry had not filed the letter.

Ruling

The court directed the Clerk of Court to enter judgment for the defendants and close the case. The order does not use the terms "with prejudice" or "without prejudice."

The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith. It therefore denied permission to proceed without paying the required fees for an appeal. The Clerk was directed to mail Terry a copy of the order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.