Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 7, 2023

Curry v. P&G Auditors and Consultants, LLC

Judge
Sarah Cave
Docket
1:20-cv-06985
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
FlsaFee PetitionCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Curry v. P&G Auditors and Consultants, LLC, Judge Cave required supporting cost records before completing review of the proposed FLSA settlement.

Who this affects

The order directly affects the plaintiffs’ counsel, who must submit records supporting the requested attorney fees and costs, and the parties’ proposed settlement review.

What happened

Curry v. P&G Auditors and Consultants, LLC is a wage-and-hour case under the Fair Labor Standards Act. The parties asked the court to approve their proposed settlement, and they agreed that Magistrate Judge Sarah L. Cave could review it.

The proposed settlement included attorney fees and costs. The court said it could not finish reviewing the settlement because the parties had not provided receipts, invoices, or other records supporting the requested costs.

Judge Sarah L. Cave ordered the plaintiffs’ counsel to submit billing records and cost documents by February 14, 2023. The order did not state that the settlement was approved or denied.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Curry v. P&G Auditors and Consultants, LLC · No. 1:20-cv-06985
Judge
Sarah Cave
Date
Feb. 7, 2023

Background

The opinion concerns two related wage-and-hour actions brought by Curry and other plaintiffs against P&G Auditors and Consultants, LLC and other defendants, including GRC Solutions, LLC and PGX, LLC. The claims arise under the Fair Labor Standards Act, a federal law governing matters such as minimum wages and overtime pay.

The parties consented to Magistrate Judge Sarah L. Cave’s jurisdiction to review their proposed settlement. They submitted a joint motion supporting the settlement and a proposed settlement agreement for approval under the Second Circuit’s requirements for reviewing Fair Labor Standards Act settlements.

Court’s Analysis

The court explained that when a proposed Fair Labor Standards Act settlement includes attorney fees and costs, the court must evaluate whether those fees and costs are reasonable. Costs generally must be reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred by attorneys and ordinarily charged to their clients. The party requesting fees and costs must provide adequate supporting documentation.

The proposed settlement allocated costs to the plaintiffs’ counsel, but the parties had not submitted documentation such as receipts or invoices supporting the requested amount. Without that documentation, the court stated that it could not complete its review of the proposed settlement.

Ruling

The court ordered the plaintiffs’ counsel to submit appropriate billing records and cost documentation corresponding to the requested attorney fees and costs by Tuesday, February 14, 2023. The opinion does not state that the court approved or denied the proposed settlement.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.