Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 8, 2023

Roberts v. BroadwayHD LLC

Judge
Katherine Failla
Docket
1:19-cv-09200
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
4
DiscoveryCivil Procedure
In one sentence

Roberts v. BroadwayHD LLC: Judge Failla limited discovery, declined other requests, and denied as moot a motion to strike affirmative defenses.

Who this affects

The order affected Chapman Roberts and the defendants, especially Sony/ATV Music Publishing, LLC, Bruce Brandwen, and the Lieber and Stoller defendants. It set discovery obligations, denied broader document requests, denied Roberts’s motion to strike as moot, and arranged a settlement conference.

What happened

In Roberts v. BroadwayHD LLC, the court held a conference about remaining document requests and next steps in the case. The parties agreed that fact discovery was complete for Amazon Digital Services and the Broadway Defendants.

The court allowed limited additional discovery from Sony about the 2000 recording of Smokey Joe’s Café and required production of newly found responsive materials by February 28, 2023. It declined to order broader searches for Sony’s licensing records or acquisition due-diligence materials, and required privilege logs from parties that withheld documents on privilege grounds.

The court denied as moot Roberts’s motion to strike certain defenses, referred the parties to a settlement conference, and said it would set a schedule for anticipated summary-judgment motions if settlement failed. Judge Katherine Polk Failla also tolled the expert-discovery deadline through the settlement conference.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Roberts v. BroadwayHD LLC · No. 1:19-cv-09200
Judge
Katherine Failla
Date
Feb. 8, 2023

Background

The court held a pretrial videoconference concerning outstanding discovery disputes and the next steps in the case. Roberts asked the court to order documents from Bruce Brandwen, Sony/ATV Music Publishing, LLC, and the Lieber and Stoller defendants. The requests included communications about Roberts and his claimed interest in vocal arrangements, invoices concerning licenses for songs from the 1999 recording and the Smokey Joe’s Café musical, and documents concerning Sony’s 2007 acquisition of the Lieber and Stoller catalog.

The responding defendants said they had already produced all discoverable materials. The court accepted Brandwen’s statement that he had produced all responsive documents, while noting that Roberts could question Brandwen under oath if Roberts believed documents were being withheld. The court also ordered parties that had withheld materials based on attorney-client privilege or another privilege to provide privilege logs by February 21, 2023.

Discovery Rulings

The court found that limited additional discovery from Sony was warranted. Sony represented that it was reviewing materials from custodians most likely to have documents related to the 2000 recording of Smokey Joe’s Café. The court directed Sony to complete that review and produce any newly found responsive materials by February 28, 2023.

The court declined to order Sony to produce documentation concerning all licenses it had granted for songs in the Lieber and Stoller catalog or its due-diligence review before acquiring that catalog. It found that the requested searches would be highly burdensome and disproportionate to the needs of the case because the information was minimally relevant, Roberts sought broad access to records involving songs in which he had no involvement, and any value concerning whether the defendants acted willfully would be limited. The court also found that Sony had already produced thousands of documents. For the same reasons, the court required no additional discovery on those topics from the Lieber and Stoller defendants.

Other Rulings and Next Steps

Based on the parties’ representations, the court denied as moot Roberts’s motion to strike certain affirmative defenses and directed the Clerk of Court to terminate that motion at docket entry 195.

The court referred the parties to a settlement conference before Magistrate Judge Lehrburger and directed them to arrange a conference in March 2023. The expert-discovery deadline was tolled from February 8, 2023, through the settlement conference, but the referral did not toll the remaining fact-discovery deadlines. The parties were ordered to file a joint status letter within three days after the conference stating whether they had reached a settlement in principle. If they had not, the court said it would promptly set a briefing schedule for the defendants’ anticipated motions for summary judgment and would dispense with its usual pre-motion submission requirement. Judge Katherine Polk Failla issued the order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.