Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 9, 2023

Talavera v. City Of New York

Judge
Colleen McMahon
Docket
1:22-cv-06670
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
DiscoveryCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Talavera v. City of New York, Judge McMahon ordered unsealing information about non-party inmates for use in the civil case.

Who this affects

The parties to the civil action and non-party inmates whose information was covered or potentially covered by New York Criminal Procedural Law §§ 160.50 and/or 160.55.

What happened

In Talavera v. City of New York, Sonia Talavera and certain City defendants jointly asked the court to produce or unseal information about non-party inmates. The information could have been protected under New York Criminal Procedural Law sections 160.50 and 160.55.

The order states that the information was material and relevant to the pending civil action. It also states that the federal court had authority to unseal records covered by those New York provisions in connection with the case.

The court ordered that the documents and information concerning the non-party inmates be unsealed and made available for use in the civil action. Judge Colleen McMahon signed the order.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Talavera v. City Of New York · No. 1:22-cv-06670
Judge
Colleen McMahon
Date
Feb. 9, 2023

Background

Sonia Talavera, acting as administrator of the estate of Herman Tito Diaz, and certain defendants identified in the order as the City Defendants jointly applied for the production and/or unsealing of information concerning non-party inmates. The requested information might have been sealed or protected from disclosure under New York Criminal Procedural Law §§ 160.50 and/or 160.55.

Court’s Reasoning

The order states that the requested information was material and relevant to the pending civil action. It further states that the federal court had inherent authority to unseal records covered by those New York provisions in connection with the action. The order cites a prior Southern District of New York decision stating that federal courts can order production of documents sealed under section 160.50.

Ruling

The court ordered that documents and information concerning non-party inmates whose information might be sealed or protected under New York Criminal Procedural Law §§ 160.50 and/or 160.55 were unsealed and could be made available for use in the civil action. Judge Colleen McMahon signed the order.

Procedural Posture and Effect

This was an order concerning access to information for use in ongoing civil litigation. It did not decide the underlying claims in the case. The opinion text does not identify the specific documents or information unsealed.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.