Adams v. Bloomberg L.P.
- Ronnie Abrams
- 1:20-cv-07724
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 3
In Adams v. Bloomberg L.P., Magistrate Judge Cott denied without prejudice Adams’s request to conditionally certify an FLSA collective action and related relief.
Sheena Adams, potential employees who might have joined the proposed FLSA collective action, and Bloomberg L.P.
What happened
In Adams v. Bloomberg L.P., Sheena Adams sued Bloomberg under the Fair Labor Standards Act and New York Labor Law and asked the court to conditionally certify a group of potentially affected employees.
Adams also asked the court to approve a notice plan, require Bloomberg to provide contact information for potential group members, and pause the limitations period for people who might join the case. Bloomberg opposed the request.
Magistrate Judge James L. Cott denied the request for conditional certification and related relief without prejudice because the court had issued a report recommending that Bloomberg receive summary judgment and that Adams’s complaint be dismissed with leave to amend. The order said Adams could renew the certification request later if circumstances justified it.
The detailed version
- Adams v. Bloomberg L.P. · No. 1:20-cv-07724
- Ronnie Abrams
- Feb. 13, 2023
Background
Sheena Adams, individually and on behalf of other similarly situated people, brought claims against Bloomberg L.P. under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and New York Labor Law. She moved for conditional certification of an FLSA collective action under 29 U.S.C. § 216(b).
Adams asked the court to include overtime-eligible Customer Support Representatives and other overtime-eligible Bloomberg employees subject to Bloomberg’s rounding policies who had worked in the United States during the three years before the original complaint was filed. She also requested approval of proposed notices, an order requiring Bloomberg to provide identifying and contact information for potential collective members, and tolling of the FLSA limitations period for potential opt-in plaintiffs as of September 18, 2020.
Related Recommendation
The order states that, earlier the same day, the court issued a Report and Recommendation to Judge Ronnie Abrams. That recommendation advised granting Bloomberg’s motion for summary judgment and dismissing Adams’s second amended complaint with leave to amend to substitute the opt-in plaintiffs. The opinion does not state that Judge Abrams had adopted that recommendation in this order.
Ruling
Magistrate Judge James L. Cott denied Adams’s motion for conditional certification and the related requested relief without prejudice. The court explained that the request could be renewed later if the case proceeded in a way that would justify conditional certification. The Clerk was directed to mark Docket No. 102 as “denied without prejudice.”
Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.