St. Juste v. YAI
- Jesse Furman
- 1:23-cv-00629
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 3
In St. Juste v. YAI, Judge Furman ordered the U.S. Marshals Service to serve YAI in St. Juste’s religion-discrimination case.
Athena St. Juste, YAI, the Clerk of Court, and the U.S. Marshals Service.
What happened
Athena St. Juste sued YAI under Title VII, claiming that her employer discriminated against her because of her religion. The court also understood her complaint to raise claims under New York City and New York State human-rights laws.
Because Athena St. Juste was allowed to proceed without paying filing fees in advance and was representing herself, the court directed the Clerk of Court and the U.S. Marshals Service to issue the summons and serve YAI. The court extended the service deadline to 90 days after the summons is issued and instructed St. Juste to request more time if service is not completed by then.
Judge Jesse M. Furman issued an order of service on February 14, 2023. The order addressed service and related case administration; it did not decide whether YAI discriminated against St. Juste.
The detailed version
- St. Juste v. YAI · No. 1:23-cv-00629
- Jesse Furman
- Feb. 14, 2023
Background
Athena St. Juste brought a self-represented lawsuit against YAI under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. She alleged that her employer discriminated against her because of her religion. The court understood the complaint to also assert claims under the New York City Human Rights Law and the New York State Human Rights Law.
The court had previously allowed St. Juste to proceed without paying filing fees in advance. In such a case, the court explained, the plaintiff may rely on the court and the U.S. Marshals Service to complete service of the summons and complaint.
Order
The court directed the Clerk of Court to complete the U.S. Marshals Service process forms for YAI, issue a summons, and deliver the necessary paperwork to the Marshals Service so it could serve YAI. The court extended the time for service to 90 days after the summons is issued because St. Juste could not have served the papers before the court reviewed the complaint and ordered issuance of the summons.
If service is not completed within that 90-day period, the order states that St. Juste should request an extension of time. The court also directed her to notify the court in writing if her address changes and stated that the action could be dismissed if she fails to do so. The Clerk was directed to mail St. Juste an information package.
Effect of the Order
This was an order about starting the service process. It did not decide the merits of St. Juste’s discrimination allegations or determine whether YAI violated any law.
Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.