Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 14, 2023

In Re: Avianca Holdings S.A.

Judge
Katherine Failla
Docket
1:23-cv-01211
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
BankruptcyCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In re Avianca Holdings S.A., Judge Failla issued a bankruptcy-appeal schedule requiring briefs and warning that missed deadlines could lead to dismissal.

Who this affects

The appellant and appellee in the bankruptcy appeal, as well as their counsel, must follow the record-designation, briefing, and other deadlines in the order.

What happened

In re Avianca Holdings S.A. is a bankruptcy appeal assigned to Judge Katherine Polk Failla in the Southern District of New York.

The order sets deadlines for identifying the appeal record and issues, filing briefs, and submitting a reply. It also says that failing to follow the order or specified bankruptcy rules could result in dismissal of the appeal or consideration without the appellee’s brief.

Judge Failla issued a scheduling order and waived the usual pre-motion conference requirement for certain motions to dismiss based on missed bankruptcy-appeal deadlines. The order does not decide the underlying appeal.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
In Re: Avianca Holdings S.A. · No. 1:23-cv-01211
Judge
Katherine Failla
Date
Feb. 14, 2023

Background

The Southern District of New York received a bankruptcy appeal involving Avianca Holdings S.A. The order states that the appeal had been assigned to Judge Failla for all purposes and had been docketed in the district court. It does not identify the appellant or appellee in the text provided.

Requirements for the Appeal

The order explains that Bankruptcy Rule 8009 requires the appellant, within 14 days after filing the notice of appeal, to identify the items to be included in the appellate record and state the issues presented. Within 14 days after receiving that statement, the appellee may identify additional record items. If the appellee filed a cross-appeal, it must also state the issues and identify additional record items for that cross-appeal.

The court did not excuse the parties from filing appeal briefs. Under the schedule adopted from Bankruptcy Rule 8018, the appellant must file a brief within 30 days after notice that the record was transmitted or is electronically available. The appellee’s brief is due within 30 days after service of the appellant’s brief, and the appellant’s reply is due within 14 days after service of the appellee’s brief, subject to the requirement that the reply be filed at least 7 days before argument unless the court grants permission otherwise.

Ruling and Effect

Judge Katherine Polk Failla entered a scheduling order governing the appeal. The order warns that failure to comply with the order or the deadlines in Bankruptcy Rules 8002, 8009, or 8018 will result in dismissal of the appeal when the appellant is responsible, or consideration of the appeal without an appellee’s brief when the appellee is responsible. The order also waives the court’s usual pre-motion conference requirement for a party moving to dismiss an appeal for failure to comply with Rules 8002, 8006, or 8009. The court did not rule on the merits of the bankruptcy appeal.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.