Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 14, 2023

Moreno v. City of New York

Judge
Robert Lehrburger
Docket
1:22-cv-03358
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
FlsaCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Moreno v. City of New York, Judge Lehrburger approved the parties’ fair and reasonable federal wage-law settlement and directed the Clerk to close the case.

Who this affects

The plaintiffs and defendants in this Fair Labor Standards Act case are affected; the approved settlement resolves the matter, and the court directed that the case be closed.

What happened

Moreno v. City of New York is a lawsuit seeking money damages under the Fair Labor Standards Act, a federal wage-and-hour law. The parties jointly asked the court to approve their settlement agreement.

The court reviewed the agreement and the parties’ letter explaining why it was fair and reasonable. It considered the risks and costs of continuing the case, possible recovery, the negotiation process, possible fraud or collusion, and attorneys’ fees.

Judge Lehrburger found the settlement fair and reasonable, approved it, and directed the Clerk of Court to close the case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Moreno v. City of New York · No. 1:22-cv-03358
Judge
Robert Lehrburger
Date
Feb. 14, 2023

Background

The case is an action for money damages under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, a federal law governing wages and working hours. The parties jointly asked the court to approve their settlement agreement. They submitted a fully executed copy of the agreement on February 14, 2023.

Court’s Review

The court explained that it must determine whether a settlement of a Fair Labor Standards Act case is fair and reasonable and resulted from genuine negotiations rather than employer overreaching. The court reviewed the settlement agreement and the parties’ detailed letter about its fairness. It also considered the prior proceedings, the risks, burdens, and costs of continuing the case, the possible range of recovery, whether the agreement resulted from negotiations between experienced counsel or the parties, the possibility of fraud or collusion, and the reasonableness of the attorneys’ fees.

Ruling

The court found that the settlement agreement was fair and reasonable and approved it. Judge Robert W. Lehrburger directed the Clerk of Court to close the case. The opinion does not state the settlement amount or other settlement terms.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.