Huzhou Chuangtai Rongyuan Investment Management Partnership v. Qin
- Katherine Failla
- 1:21-cv-09221
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 3
In Huzhou Chuangtai Rongyuan Investment Management Partnership v. Qin, Judge Failla granted Petitioners’ request to file redacted documents and keep unredacted versions sealed.
The ruling affected the Petitioners, Hui Qin, the parties’ access to the specified filings, and public access to the unredacted documents.
What happened
Huzhou Chuangtai Rongyuan Investment Management Partnership v. Qin involved Petitioners’ request to redact certain filings and file other documents under seal while pursuing a motion to compel.
Petitioners said the materials contained sensitive personal information, including addresses, bank-account information, tax returns, property information, and information about minor family members. They also said some documents had been designated confidential under a protective order.
Judge Katherine Polk Failla granted the application. She allowed Petitioners to file redacted versions of their opening memorandum and supporting declarations from Lening Liu and Carol Lee, and directed the Clerk to keep the unredacted versions under seal for viewing only by the parties and the Court.
The detailed version
- Huzhou Chuangtai Rongyuan Investment Management Partnership v. Qin · No. 1:21-cv-09221
- Katherine Failla
- Feb. 15, 2023
Background
Petitioners Huzhou Chuangtai Rongyuan Investment Management Partnership, Huzhou Huihengying Equity Investment Partnership, and Huzhou Huirongsheng Equity Investment Partnership asked for permission to file certain materials with redactions and other materials under seal. The request was made in connection with Petitioners’ motion to compel and relied on the parties’ stipulated protective order.
Petitioners asserted that the materials contained sensitive personal identifying information, including Hui Qin’s addresses, bank-account information, tax returns, property information, and information about minor family members. Some documents had also been marked confidential under the protective order. The request discussed the presumption that judicial documents should generally be available to the public and argued that the privacy interests in protecting this information outweighed that presumption.
Ruling
The Court granted the application. Petitioners may file redacted versions of their opening memorandum of law and supporting declarations from Lening Liu and Carol Lee. The Clerk of Court was directed to maintain the unredacted versions of those documents—Docket Entries 108, 109, and 111—under seal, viewable only by the parties and the Court. The Clerk was also directed to terminate the motion at Docket Entry 105.
Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.